3x3 similar matrices defined by characteristic and minimal polynomials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Two 3x3 matrices are similar if and only if their characteristic polynomial and minimal polynomial are equal. This property holds true due to the limited ways to decompose 3x3 matrices into Jordan blocks, which describe matrices up to conjugacy. In contrast, this relationship does not extend to 4x4 matrices, where additional complexity arises. The discussion emphasizes the significance of Jordan blocks in understanding matrix similarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Jordan blocks in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with characteristic and minimal polynomials
  • Knowledge of matrix similarity and conjugacy
  • Basic concepts of 3x3 matrix decomposition
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Jordan blocks in detail
  • Explore the differences between 3x3 and 4x4 matrix similarity
  • Learn about the implications of minimal polynomials in matrix theory
  • Investigate applications of matrix similarity in linear transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, matrix theory, and advanced topics in eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

JamesTheBond
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Why do you guys think that given two 3x3 matrices, they are similar if and only if their characteristic polynomial and minimal polynomial are equal (this reasonably fails for 4v4 matrices though)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just consider the Jordan Blocks
 
Not exactly sure what you mean. How do Jordan blocks get involved?
 
Jordan blocks are what describe matrices up to conjugacy. In a 3x3 matrix there are very few ways to decompose as Jordan block matrices, which answers your question as to why 3x3 (and 2x2) matrices are completely determined by their minimal polynomials.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K