Undergrad 4d integration/differentiation notation and the total derivative

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the notation and implications of 4D integration and differentiation in the context of total derivatives. It questions why a term like δνμ is not necessary in the expression for the total derivative when integrating a scalar field φ over a 4D volume. The reasoning provided highlights that the index μ is a dummy variable, leading to an imbalance in the integration process. Consequently, the 4D integral simplifies to a 3D integral of the function. This clarification emphasizes the treatment of indices in the context of multidimensional calculus.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
TL;DR
4d notation integration/differentiation
This is probably a stupid question but,

## \frac{d\partial_p}{d\partial_c}=\delta^p_c ##

For the notation of a 4D integral it is ##d^4x=dx^{\nu}##, so if I consider a total derivative:

##\int\limits^{x_f}_{x_i} \partial_{\mu} (\phi) d^4 x = \phi \mid^{x_f}_{x_i} ##

why is there no ##\delta_{\nu}^{\mu}## sort of term required?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Mu" is a dummy free index, so it is imbalanced. You can only pick one value for it and integrate with respect to it. Therefore, the 4th order integral becomes a regular 3d integral of a function. Let us differentiate with respect to ##x_0##. We obtain$$\int_{x_{1,i}}^{x_{1,f}} dx_1 {} \int_{x_{2,i}}^{x_{2,f}} dx_2 {} \int_{x_{3,i}}^{x_{3,f}} dx_3 {} [\phi(x_{0,f},x_1,x_2,x_3)-\phi(x_{0,i},x_1,x_2,x_3)] $$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K