Total derivative in action of the field theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the least action principle in field theory, specifically addressing the total derivative term in the context of Lagrangian mechanics. The integral of the total derivative, represented as $$\int \partial_\mu (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi) d^4x$$, simplifies to zero due to the vanishing variation at spatial infinity. The participants clarify the mathematical transition from the total derivative to the differential form and emphasize the necessity of considering spatial infinity in the context of boundary conditions for variational principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and field theory
  • Familiarity with variational calculus and boundary conditions
  • Knowledge of tensor calculus, particularly mixed tensors
  • Proficiency in manipulating integrals in multiple dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equations in field theory
  • Learn about boundary conditions in variational principles, focusing on spatial infinity
  • Explore the concept of total derivatives in the context of differential forms
  • Investigate the implications of proper time integration in relativistic mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students of theoretical physics who are delving into field theory, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of the least action principle and its applications in relativistic contexts.

victorvmotti
Messages
152
Reaction score
5
When applying the least action I see that a term is considered total derivative.

Two points are not clear to me.

We say that first
$$\int \partial_\mu (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi) d^4x= \int d(\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)= (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)$$

And then because the variation at the spatial infinity vanishes this terms is equal to zero.

I do not get the calculation from $$\partial_\mu (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi) d^4x=\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial x^\mu} dtdxdydz$$ to

$$d(\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)=\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial t}dt+\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial x}dx+\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial y}dy+\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial z}dz$$
$$\neq \frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial x^\mu} dtdxdydz$$

Can you expand this to fill the gap for me.

Also, why we require "spatial infinity" here, isn't it also true that $$\delta \phi$$ in the $$\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi$$ vanishes at any two endpoints of the path, why we require infinity here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's set [itex]S^\mu=\frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi[/itex]. As you can see, it has a free index, so its a four-vector.
Now if we differentiate it, we'll have [itex]\partial_\nu S^\mu[/itex](which is a 2nd rank mixed tensor). But what you want, is the contraction of this, which becomes:
[itex] \partial_\mu S^\mu=\partial_0 S^0+\partial_1 S^1+\partial_2 S^2+\partial_3 S^3[/itex]
So:
[itex] \partial_\mu S^\mu d^4 x=\partial_0 S^0 dt dx dy dz+\partial_1 S^1dt dx dy dz+\partial_2 S^2dt dx dy dz+\partial_3 S^3dt dx dy dz[/itex]
Given that you can do the integrations in any order, the result you wanted is concluded.

About your second question, its only that we take the spatial end points to be at infinity and the temporal ones, just two moments in time. But this isn't manifestly relativistic so I guess its better to integrate w.r.t. the proper time but I still don't know how to do that, I should work on it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K