Exceeding Limits: The 621 Million Transistor Chip

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transistor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The KiloCore chip, designed by UC Davis, features 1,000 independent programmable processors and boasts a computation rate of 1.78 trillion instructions per second, utilizing 621 million transistors. While modern CPUs typically exceed 1 billion transistors, the KiloCore's unique massively parallel architecture distinguishes it from traditional GPU-like CPUs. It operates efficiently at approximately 0.7W, significantly lower than the NVIDIA 970's minimum of 145W, and runs on a single 6V battery. This chip represents a significant advancement in parallel processing capabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of microchip architecture
  • Familiarity with transistor technology and density metrics
  • Knowledge of parallel processing concepts
  • Basic comprehension of energy efficiency in computing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design principles of massively parallel processors
  • Explore advancements in transistor density beyond 32nm technology
  • Learn about energy-efficient computing and its implications
  • Investigate the Verilog hardware description language and its applications in chip design
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, computer architects, and technology enthusiasts interested in advancements in microchip design and energy-efficient computing solutions.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
I thought we were on the limit for transistor density but this chip looks like it is way over that limit.

From science daily.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160617215802.htm

A microchip containing 1,000 independent programmable processors has been designed. The energy-efficient 'KiloCore' chip has a maximum computation rate of 1.78 trillion instructions per second and contains 621 million transistors.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ho hum. Modern off the shelf CPU chips routinely have over 1,000,000,000 transistors so 621,000,000 isn't particularly impressive.

The one in my desktop has 1,400,000,000 and it's not particularly high end.
 
Last edited:
@phinds - the chip described in the article is massively parallel, and is unique. IMO. It is fundamentally different from a GPU-like cpu as you cited. And apparently very efficient - energy consumption ~0.7W as opposed to an NVIDIA 970 which is 145W minimum. It runs on a single 6V battery.

"To the best of our knowledge, it is the world's first 1,000-processor chip and it is the highest clock-rate processor ever designed in a university," said Bevan Baas, professor of electrical and computer engineering, who led the team that designed the chip architecture
- UC Davis
 
jim mcnamara said:
@phinds - the chip described in the article is massively parallel, and is unique. IMO. It is fundamentally different from a GPU-like cpu as you cited. And apparently very efficient - energy consumption ~0.7W as opposed to an NVIDIA 970 which is 145W minimum. It runs on a single 6V battery.

- UC Davis
Agreed, but the OP was commenting on his thought that this had hit a limit in transistor density, which is what I was responding to.

EDIT: Hm ... I see that actually I was not looking at the DENSITY of the chip, just the number of transistors so my point may be off.
 
Last edited:
wolram said:
I thought we were on the limit for transistor density but this chip looks like it is way over that limit.

32nm technology is not as dense as it gets these days. Go here, and look to the right towards the top of the page for a table that puts 32nm in perspective.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Technology_Roadmap_for_Semiconductors

The big deal about the chip you referenced is the amount of parallel processing it can do - imo quite impressive.
 
Millions, trillions of transistors.
Wouldn't it be fun to scroll the circuit diagram of such a beast?

Ah... well... maybe not ; )

John
 
D_Arsonval said:
Wouldn't it be fun to scroll the circuit diagram of such a beast?
Actually, I'm pretty sure these things are built with magic ... no diagram required :smile:
 
Clarke's Third Law
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." (Arthur C. Clarke)
 
I doubt there ever was a circuit diagram. It went:

verilog --> netlist --> gds --> chip
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K