MHB -7.68 Determine the value z* to satisfy the following conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions Value
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{7.68}$
Normal curve $\quad\mu=12\quad\sigma = 2$
Let z denote a variable that a standard normal distribution.
Determintie the value $z*$ to satisfy the following conditions:
a. $P(z<z*)=.025$
b. $P(z<z*)=.01$
c. $P(z<z*)=.05$
d. $P(z<z*)=.02$
e. $P(z>z*)=.01$
f. $P(z>z*)\textbf{ or }(z<-z*)=.20$

ok I want to do these one at a time especially a,d and f

example on page 411 of text
SSCtw.png
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$$\text{let $\Phi(z)$ be the CDF of the standard normal. That function they make tables of. You'll need some form of that.}\\~\\

\text{Then $\Phi\left(\dfrac{z - \mu}{\sigma}\right)$ is the CDF of a normal distribution centered at $\mu$ with standard deviation $\sigma$}\\~\\

\text{So $P(z < z^*) = \Phi\left(\dfrac{z^*-\mu}{\sigma}\right)$}$$

Similarly

$$P(z > z^*) = 1-\Phi\left(\dfrac{z^*-\mu}{\sigma}\right)$$

Finally for (f) the probability of two non-intersecting intervals is the sum of the individual interval probabilities.

You'll actually have to use the inverse function $$\Phi^{-1}(p)$$ as they give you probabilities.

For example (a)

$$P(z < z^*) = 0.25\\
\text{we look up in the table $0.25$ (actually I just use software) and find that it corresponds to a "z-score", as it's commonly known, of $-0.67449$}\\
\dfrac{z^* - \mu}{\sigma} = -0.67449\\~\\
z^* = \mu - 0.67449\sigma = 10.651$$
 
Last edited:
mahalo
ill try the rest
romsek said:
$$\text{let $\Phi(z)$ be the CDF of the standard normal. That function they make tables of. You'll need some form of that.}\\
\text{Then $\Phi\left(\dfrac{z - \mu}{\sigma}\right)$ is the CDF of a normal distribution centered at $\mu$ with standard deviation $\sigma$}\\
\text{So $P(z < z^*) = \Phi\left(\dfrac{z^*-\mu}{\sigma}\right)$}$$
Similarly
$$P(z > z^*) = 1-\Phi\left(\dfrac{z^*-\mu}{\sigma}\right)$$
Finally for (f) the probability of two non-intersecting intervals is the sum of the individual interval probabilities.
You'll actually have to use the inverse function $$\Phi^{-1}(p)$$ as they give you probabilities.
For example (a)
$$P(z < z^*) = 0.25\\
\text{we look up in the table $0.25$ (actually I just use software) and find that it corresponds to a "z-score", as it's commonly known, of $-0.67449$}\\
\dfrac{z^* - \mu}{\sigma} = -0.67449\\
z^* = \mu - 0.67449\sigma = 10.651$$

mahalo
ill try the rest
 
Last edited:
Determintie the value z∗z∗ to satisfy the following conditions

[c] $P(z<z*)=.05$
$\quad\dfrac{z^* - \mu}{\sigma} =-5.975 \textbf{ so } z^*=(12)-5.975(2)=.05$

did something wrong...

z score calc
 
use calculate z from p
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top