Schrodinger cat superperposition vs sharp state

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment, emphasizing that the cat cannot exist in a superposition of states when observed. Participants clarify that while the state outside the box is in superposition, the internal state is definitively either dead or alive upon observation. The experiment remains unperformed due to the complexities of isolating the cat from environmental influences. The original intent of Schrödinger's proposal in 1935 was to critique quantum mechanics, ultimately leading to the understanding of quantum decoherence, which explains the absence of observable superpositions in macroscopic systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of superposition
  • Knowledge of quantum decoherence
  • Basic grasp of thought experiments in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "quantum decoherence" and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Read David Lindley's book "Where Does the Weirdness Go?" for accessible insights
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics to understand state definitions
  • Investigate current experimental designs testing macroscopic superposition
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of quantum theory and thought experiments.

GC2893
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
On the Schrödinger cat, can I simply say, outside the box,the state is in superposition,but inside the box, the state is not. Besides, the experiment is so simple to do, how come no body ever did it ?. Just put an animal you hate or even an inset, and observe the expected (50% -50%) result.

Another suggestion , instead of doing something bad , simply drop a candid to the hand of a human being inside when the isotope decay , and ask that person his experience when the box is open (what did your watch show when you received the candid, or you never receive a candid?)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody did it because the outcome is certain and understood. Looking at a cat with a wave function half in the grave looks either dead or alive. It's wave function is not an observable and it's "observable" live or dead has only two values.
 
GC2893 said:
On the Schrödinger cat, can I simply say, outside the box,the state is in superposition,but inside the box, the state is not. Besides, the experiment is so simple to do, how come no body ever did it ?. Just put an animal you hate or even an inset, and observe the expected (50% -50%) result.

Problem is you cannot isolate the cat etc from the environment. If it were a simple experiment to do, I would have thought some people had done it by now. You have groups across the world who are designing experiments to test for macroscopic superposition, which need careful planning and set-up.
 
GC2893 said:
On the Schrödinger cat, can I simply say, outside the box,the state is in superposition,but inside the box, the state is not.

You cannot. The system is defined by its state, so it can only have one state.

However, you may be misunderstanding the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment. When Schrödinger proposed his thought experiment in 1935 he was not trying to suggest that the cat might be in a superposition of dead and alive; everyone agreed, then and now, that it would not. Whether we open the box or not, the cat is either dead or alive so opening the box just tells us which - it is no more mysterious than if I toss a coin and then have to look to see how it landed before I know if it's heads-up or tails-up. Schrödinger proposed his thought experiment to show that something was wrong with the then-current understanding of quantum mechanics: it did not explain why the cat would not end up a dead/alive superposition, even though that clearly did not happen.

It took several more decades to discover the solution: if the math is done correctly the dead/alive superposition won't appear. You can Google for "quantum decoherence" or for a less mathematically daunting explanation read David Lindley's book "Where does the weirdness go".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
11K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
918
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K