A basic question on quantum mechanics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around quantum mechanics, specifically the measurement of energy in relation to the Hamiltonian operator and its eigenstates. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the relationship between wave functions, eigenvectors, and the application of the expectation value formula for energy measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of eigenstates of the Hamiltonian and question whether all states are eigenstates. There is an attempt to clarify the process of finding eigenstates through differential equations related to specific Hamiltonians.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the use of the expectation value formula for energy measurements, noting that it can be applied regardless of whether the wave function is an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and clarifications without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion stemming from the application of the expectation value formula without explicit verification of the eigenstates in position space. The original poster's inquiry highlights the complexities involved in understanding the foundational aspects of quantum mechanics.

dragonlorder
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Quantum physics' postulate says that when you measurement a quantity. you have to express the wave function in the basis of that operator's eigenvector. I am confused by the following: If you want to measure a system's energy, [tex]H|\psi>= H|i><i|\psi>[/tex], but how do you find the eigenvector for the energy measurement operator? is every vector an eigenvector of the operator?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not all states are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. How do you find the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian? Do you know a famous equation in quantum mechanics that looks like an eigenvalue equation for the Hamiltonian?
 
I assume you mean the basis? You're looking for the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. What you've written is a change of basis. Nonetheless, you attempt to find solutions to differential equations based on what your Hamiltonian is. For example, if you have the small harmonic oscillator where [tex]H = \frac{{P^2}}{{2m}} + \frac{{m\omega ^2 X^2 }}{2}[/tex], you're looking to solve the equation [tex]\frac{{\hbar ^2 }}{{2m}}\frac{{d^2 y(x)}}{{dx^2 }} + \frac{{m\omega ^2 x^2 y(x)}}{2} = Ey(x)[/tex]. Those solutions form a basis for the solutions.
 
the main reason that I am confused it that, I saw some solutions to some problems where you were given a wave function expressed in position space [tex]\psi (r,t)[/tex]. And they measured the energy using the expectation value formula, [tex]<\psi|H|\psi>/<\psi|\psi>[/tex]. How do they know the basis in position space is eigenvectors of H because they didn't check ,instead they just use the formula. they just differentiate the wavefunction [tex]H= -h^2 \triangle /2m + V(R,t)[/tex]. So my main question is that, how do they know the basis is appropriate for applying the formula directly. sorry if I made it unclear
 
Ok, I understand your question now. The reason they can use that formula directly is because it applies whether the wave function is an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian or not. If it is not, then it does not give the energy (which is uncertain), but the expectation of the energy (the average value if the energy was measured many times).
 
LeonhardEuler said:
Ok, I understand your question now. The reason they can use that formula directly is because it applies whether the wave function is an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian or not. If it is not, then it does not give the energy (which is uncertain), but the expectation of the energy (the average value if the energy was measured many times).

Ah! awww, thank you. Thanks everyone. That solves the problem ^ ^
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K