A block on a wedge which itself sliding

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing the motion of a block sliding on a wedge, where both the block and wedge are subject to gravitational forces. The initial reasoning involves using Newton's laws to determine the forces acting on the block and wedge, but the complexity arises due to the non-inertial frame of reference. The participants suggest that conservation laws could be applied, despite the problem being introduced before these concepts were covered in their studies. Two solutions from a textbook are referenced: one using conservation of momentum and energy, and another employing Newton's laws with a fictitious force in a non-inertial frame. The challenge remains in finding accessible resources for the textbook to further explore these solutions.
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A small block of mass m is sliding along the inclined slope of a wedge of mass M.
The block slides without friction on the wedge and the wedge slides without friction on the floor. The slope on the wedge has an inclination \alpha with the floor.


Homework Equations


Newtons etc... gravity, normal force.


The Attempt at a Solution


I reason as follows: Gravity pulls the upper box down along the wedge with a force mg \sin \alpha
but it also has a component normal to the wegde being mg \cos \alpha.
Now this has to equal the normal force from the wedge on the box, so N =mg cos \alpha, but this is in an action-reaction par with the weight of the box acting on the wedge so the wedge feels a force in the negative direction along the plane of the floor of
mg \sin \alpha \cos \alpha indicating that it would get an acelleration of a_M = \frac{mg}{M} \sin \alpha \cos \alpha while the little box would get an acceleration of a_m = g\cos\alpha.

This is what I would naivly do, but after some time i realize that the box on top is in an
accelerated frame so I can't blindly apply Newtons laws here and therefore the reasoning fails. How would I then go about analyzing this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps try looking at it from the center of momentum frame? If the block and wedge begin from rest, then the center of mass should stay put in the x direction, and the momenta of the block and wedge should be equal and opposite (summing to zero).

Then perhaps you can finesse their relative motions with conservation of energy to come up with something.
 
That's a good idea and I will certainly try it. The only thing is that this problem was introduced in a book in an earlier chapter before encountering any conservation of anything. The only thing that has been introduced is Newtons laws, constrained motion etc. so I suspect there is a way to do this just using Newtons laws in a straight forward way...

But then again, they do break down in an accelerated frame...
 
In their textbook: Elements of Newtonian Mechanics, 3rd Ed., J. M. Knudsen and P. G. Hjorth show 2 solutions to this problem.

In one solution, they use conservation laws: for both momentum and energy.

Their other solution uses Newton's equations of motion. They do this using a non-inertial reference frame fixed to the wedge, and use a fictitious force to compensate for using a non-inertial reference frame.

You can find this textbook on Google books. The solution begins on page 209.
 
  • Like
Likes Travis Yeager
Sammy, that page isn't available on Google Books. It looks like it might stop around page 74 unfortunately. Any other leads on where I might be able to find it?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top