A capacitor-like system, is this really a cap?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joemok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a capacitor-like system involving two metal plates, one earthed and the other positively charged. The original poster explores the effects of moving the earthed plate closer to the charged plate on electric potential and electric field strength, questioning the behavior of charge flow and potential changes in this configuration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the situation using equations related to capacitors, expressing uncertainty about charge flow and the implications of moving the plates closer together. They raise specific questions about the validity of their reasoning and the behavior of charge on the plates.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging with the original poster's questions, providing insights into the behavior of charge and potential in the system. Some suggest that the charge on the grounded plate will match that of the charged plate, while others emphasize the relationship between capacitance, voltage, and electric field strength. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these relationships without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the earthed plate as a reference point for potential and discuss the implications of treating the system as an open circuit. The discussion acknowledges the complexities of charge behavior in this setup, particularly regarding transient states and equilibrium conditions.

joemok
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A is an earthed metal plate while B is a positively charged metal plate parallel to A. The separation between the plates is much less than the length of each plate. If A is moved closer to B, what would happen to the electric potential of B and the electric field strength between the plates?

Homework Equations


I haven't pick the quick capacitor equations as i think there are differences and the equations:
1.E= V/d, are not practical here as both V and d decreases.
2.V = Q/C, i doubt if Q change

At last, I use E= Q/(AK), where K is the permitivity

The Attempt at a Solution


1. As A which is negatively charged moves closer to B, it solely establish a more negative potential at B and the resultant of the potential decreases.

2.On the other hand, the voltage of A should increase as it is closer to B, but as A is earthed, there are some negative charges flow into A to make it 0V, i.e. unchanged.
Applying E = Q/(AK) we know the E field produced by A increases and that of B is constant as charge on B is constant.
i.e. E resultant increases

My teacher told me to treat it like a capacitor and as the capacitor is on a open circuit, there must not be changes on Q, i.e. (Q1-Q2)/2. As a result of V=Q/C decreases and E=Q/(AK) remains unchanged.

Here comes my actual questions:
1. Is there really no charge flow even when one plate is earthed?
2. what is wrong with my approach?

Note:
1.the model answer: V decreases, E constant.
2. My teacher also told me to think in another way, the earthed A plate is just to make the potential reference constant. and we can see both plates isolated, in this case V can be seem as the potential difference of the plates.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i really need help. Please say something about the approaches, is it valid?
 
Here comes my actual questions:
1. Is there really no charge flow even when one plate is earthed?
2. what is wrong with my approach?

1. The charged plate is isolated and so keeps constant Q. The charge on the grounded plate will exactly match that on the charged plate, as soon as the transient current stops.

2. the subtle thing is that the capacitance increases as the plates are brought together, so the voltage falls - and the field stays constant ( as your teacher as said).
 
Mentz114 said:
1. The charged plate is isolated and so keeps constant Q. The charge on the grounded plate will exactly match that on the charged plate, as soon as the transient current stops.

Thank you.
But i am still curious about what is wrong with my arguments that negative charge on A will increase. Can you explain to me?
 
Usually equilibrium states have the least potential energy and I expect that's what happens here.
Because the capacitance increases and the voltage drops, there no need for the charge on A to change to maintain equilibrium.
 
Mentz114 said:
Usually equilibrium states have the least potential energy and I expect that's what happens here.
Because the capacitance increases and the voltage drops, there no need for the charge on A to change to maintain equilibrium.

Won't B makes A's potential higher than 0v if there are no charge flowing into A?
Even though it is not a complete circuit, is it possible for some charge flowing into A?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K