A choice within condensed matter theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision-making process for selecting a research area within condensed matter theory (CMT) for graduate studies. The participant, Matt Lorig, is torn between pursuing field theory with three sought-after professors and exploring non-field theoretic areas such as non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, density functional theory (DFT), and computational methods, which may offer broader job prospects. Insights indicate that while non-field theoretic areas may have more job opportunities, expertise in field theory remains valuable. Ultimately, passion for the subject should guide the decision, as this will lead to a more fulfilling academic and professional journey.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of condensed matter theory (CMT)
  • Familiarity with field theory and many-body physics
  • Knowledge of density functional theory (DFT)
  • Awareness of non-equilibrium statistical mechanics and computational methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research current job market trends for physicists in academia and industry
  • Explore the applications of density functional theory (DFT) in various fields
  • Investigate methodologies in strongly-correlated systems within condensed matter theory
  • Learn about the implications of field theory in many-body physics
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in physics, particularly those interested in condensed matter theory, academic advisors, and researchers evaluating career paths in theoretical and applied physics.

mattlorig
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I will begin physics grad school this fall. I am pretty well decided on studying condensed matter theory. But, within CM theory, I'm not sure which area I should choose.

On one hand, there are three professors at my school who mainly use field theory to solve many body problems. Ideally I'd like to work for one of these three professors because I find there work quite interesting. Unfortunately, so do most of the other students in my grad school. So, trying to get one of these three as my advisor will no doubt be rather challanging.

On the other hand, there are 5 or 6 CM theorists that work with non-field theoretic areas like non-equilibirum stat mech, density functional theory, computational methods, complex systems, etc. There won't be as much competition to work with these professors, and I may not find there research as interesting as the field-theory guys (though, I don't know that yet).

My long-term goal is to work in Academia. So, one of the things I'm trying to look at are long-term career prospects. My perception is that it is much easier to find a job within academia if one works in one of the areas that the non-field theory professors. This is because the non-field theory profs research involves many fields: biophysics, chemistry, materials research (i.e. more job opportunities). On the other hand, it seems like if one wants to work in CM field theory, one needs to be some sort of genius or rising academic superstar (which I seriously doubt I am).

So, I guess my question is the following: Is my perception about long-term job prospects accurate? If so, I'm not so sure I want to kill myself trying to work for one of the field theory guys. That would be a lot of extra work to essentially limit my job prospects. I mean, I like physics. But, I don't want it to be my entire life.

If you want any other info from me, let me know. Otherwise, thanks in advance for any advice you can offer.

Matt Lorig
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It appears that you are describing the methodologies, but not specifically the area of CM that these people are working in. That is actually quite a significant factor that can determine what area of CM that methodology is applied to. DFT, for example, isn't widely used to describe a Mott insulator ground state in the study of strongly-correlated systems. Yet, the area of strongly-correlated system is one of the most significant area of CM with wide-ranging applications. So knowing what area of CM these methodologies are being used is rather important.

Secondly, as a theorist, you are also expected to know a lot of these methologies, even if you are not working in it. People who work using DFT needs to know field theoretic method simply to know when it fails. In fact, you will need to know QFT when you do many-body physics.

Thirdly, the clearest way to know what kind of jobs are available now, is to look at the job ads for physicists (I have listed this a few times). It is quite difficult to predict long-range demands. It is also something out of your control once you have made your decision on the area of physics you want to go into (2nd guessing at this point is not a good idea).

Zz.
 
e

First of all, congratulations on starting your journey towards a physics graduate degree! It's great that you have a clear interest in condensed matter theory and are considering your options carefully.

In terms of your question about long-term job prospects, it's important to remember that there are a variety of career paths available for physicists, both within academia and outside of it. While it may be true that there are more job opportunities in non-field theoretic areas, there will still be demand for experts in field theory as well. It's also worth considering that the job market can change over time and it's difficult to predict exactly what opportunities will be available in the future.

Ultimately, the most important factor in your decision should be your interest and passion for the subject. If you are truly passionate about field theory and are willing to put in the extra effort to work with one of the top professors in that area, then it may be worth pursuing. However, if you are not as interested in that specific area and are more drawn to the non-field theoretic topics, then it may be a better choice to focus on those areas. Remember, your graduate studies are a time to explore and find your niche within the field of condensed matter theory.

It's also worth considering that even within the non-field theoretic areas, there may be competition for top professors and research opportunities. It's important to have a backup plan and be open to exploring different areas within your field of interest.

In the end, the most important thing is to follow your passion and choose a research topic that you are truly excited about. This will not only make your graduate studies more fulfilling, but it will also set you up for a successful and rewarding career in the long term. Best of luck in your decision-making process!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
826
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K