MHB A Clausen function triplication formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter DreamWeaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Function
DreamWeaver
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Define the second order Clausen function by:$$\text{Cl}_2(\varphi) = -\int_0^{\varphi} \log\Bigg| 2\sin \frac{x}{2} \Bigg|\, dx = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\sin k\varphi}{k^2}$$Prove the triplication formula:$$\text{Cl}_2(3\varphi) = 3\text{Cl}_2(\varphi) + 3\text{Cl}_2\left(\varphi+ \frac{2\pi}{3} \right) + 3\text{Cl}_2\left(\varphi+ \frac{4\pi}{3} \right)$$Hint:
Consider the triplication formula for the Sine:

$$\sin 3x = 3\sin x-4\sin^3 x$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Use the Fourier series.The triplication formula can be proven by starting with the Fourier series representation of the second order Clausen function:

\text{Cl}_2(\varphi) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\sin k\varphi}{k^2}

We can then use the identity $\sin(3x) = 3\sin x - 4\sin^3 x$ to expand $\sin 3\varphi$ in terms of sines of multiples of $\varphi$. This leads to the following expression for $\text{Cl}_2(3\varphi)$:

\text{Cl}_2(3\varphi) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{3\sin k\varphi - 4\sin^3 k\varphi}{k^2}

By expanding the right-hand side of this equation into separate sums for each term, we can rearrange it to obtain the triplication formula:

\text{Cl}_2(3\varphi) = 3\text{Cl}_2(\varphi) + 3\text{Cl}_2\left(\varphi+ \frac{2\pi}{3} \right) + 3\text{Cl}_2\left(\varphi+ \frac{4\
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top