A controversial question came in a Government job exam

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a controversial question from a government job exam regarding Vietnam's economic and political statements. Participants debate the appropriateness and clarity of the question, as well as the validity of the statements provided.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the question is too general and cannot be answered definitively, suggesting it is only solvable by the question maker.
  • Others propose that the answer is (d), but express concerns about the vagueness of several statements, particularly regarding the term "most" in statement 5.
  • One participant notes that statements 3 and 4 could apply to many globalized countries, questioning why the question focuses specifically on Vietnam.
  • Some participants highlight that knowing just two of the five statements is sufficient to answer the question correctly, indicating a potential flaw in the question's design.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of test-taking skills and how they may affect the ability to answer such questions, with some suggesting that the question could be intentionally tricky.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of the statements, with one participant questioning the confidence required to eliminate statement 5.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the validity of the question and the clarity of the statements. While some agree on the answer being (d), others express skepticism about the statements' accuracy and relevance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the question's vagueness and generality may lead to multiple interpretations, and the reliance on current knowledge of Vietnam's economy and politics adds to the complexity of answering it correctly.

  • #31
WWGD said:
Why does it display India's population ( upper left) as 0?
Censorship.(?)

It seems that India is leaning towards a dictatorship, which is much easier if the masses are kept ignorant. :cry:

This link is actually to a text article with an audio option.


(above, and many more, found with:
https://www.google.com/search?&q=censorship+in+india)

Cheers(?),
Tom
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I cannot believe that the Indian Govt would censor the estimated number of inhabitants. Perhaps it was 0 there because they were supposed to have a census in 2021 (which, due to CoViD had to be postponed, as it happened in Romania, for example). Either way, even if the Govt won't say how many inhabitants live within their borders, the UN is pretty sure that at the beginning of 2024 the population of India will be bigger in number than the population of China. And both of them will be almost 3 billion when added.
 
  • #33
To the OP:

I agree that the question is somewhat poorly worded. For example, in multiple choice #1:
  1. Vietnam has been one of the fastest growing economies in the world in the recent years.
This is an assertion that requires a definition of what is meant by "recent years" (the last 2 years, last 5 years, last 10 years), as well as a source for the assertion.

Similarly, for multiple choice option #4 below:

  • For a long time Vietnam’s low labour costs and stable exchange rates have attracted global manufacturers.
What is meant by a "long time"?

If these statements can be re-worded to be more precise, then I think the question itself is valid.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K