A curious question on the inapplicability of Faraday's law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inapplicability of Faraday's law in certain scenarios, particularly when analyzing a stationary circuit in a constant magnetic field. While Faraday's law indicates no current should flow due to a constant magnetic flux, the Lorentz force law suggests otherwise, as it accounts for the motion of charges within the magnetic field. The key takeaway is that the electromotive force in Faraday's law relies on a change in magnetic flux over time, which does not occur in this case, despite the movement of the conducting sheet generating a Lorentz force on the electrons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz force law
  • Basic knowledge of magnetic flux and its calculation
  • Concept of electromotive force (EMF) in circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of Faraday's law and its applications
  • Explore the implications of the Lorentz force law in electromagnetic systems
  • Investigate scenarios where Faraday's law may not apply
  • Examine the relationship between magnetic flux and induced current in various configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and their applications in circuit design.

Nanyang
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I recently came across this article on wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_paradox#Inapplicability_of_Faraday.27s_law"
In this example, the circuit does not move, and the magnetic flux through the circuit is not changing, so Faraday's law suggests no current flows. However, the Lorentz force law suggests a current does flow.

I don't understand why is it that Faraday's law is inapplicable here. But wouldn't there be a increase in magnetic flux, since the open surface will increase in area being exposed to the magnetic field. For example, if you have a circular ring of charges and you let the charges move radially outwards, then the area enclosed by this ring will increase.

So if I have a closed loop that first goes in the conducting part of the material in the direction of v X B and then through some other path to complete the loop. Then when the charges move in the direction of v, the closed loop will increase the area of the open surface exposed to B and therefore the flux increases and the current produced is exactly that as predicted using the Lorentz force law. So both laws work well... am I correct? :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The electromotive force in Faraday's law is due to a change in the magnetic flux in time. The magnetic flux is the total magnetic field normal to a surface.

\mathcal{E} = - \frac{d}{dt} \int \mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{S}

The surface exposed to the magnetic field that we will be taking the flux over is constant for a given time T. This is the time between the left edge of the translating sheet just leaving the "light area" and until the right edge of the translating sheet engers the "light area." During the time that the area illuminated by the light is constant, the flux is constant since the magnetic field is a constant field applied to the same area as the light. This area does not change nor does the magnetic field, hence its time invariance. However, the movement of the sheet itself gives rise to a velocity on the electrons which must experience a Lorentz force from the magnetic field.

A better way to think of it is to assume that the translating sheet is infinitely long. So there isn't a time when the sheet enter or leaves area illuminated by the light and magnetic field.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
667
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K