MHB A false approach to an integral....

  • Thread starter Thread starter chisigma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach Integral
Click For Summary
The integral $\int_{0}^{2\pi} \sqrt{1 + \sin^{2} x}\ dx$ initially appears solvable using the substitution $z = e^{ix}$ and the residue theorem. However, complications arise due to the presence of two branch points at $z=1 - \sqrt{2}$ and $z=\sqrt{2}-1$, which lie within the unit circle. This necessitates contour deformation around these branch points, complicating the application of the residue theorem. The consensus suggests that while the integral may be solvable through contour integration, it is more complex than using elliptic integrals. Thus, the direct application of the residue theorem is deemed impossible without careful path selection.
chisigma
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,627
Reaction score
0
In...

http://mathhelpboards.com/questions-other-sites-52/unsolved-analysis-number-theory-other-sites-7479-3.html#post38136

... it has been found the value the integral...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{2\ \pi} \sqrt{1 + \sin^{2} x}\ dx\ (1)$ At first it seems feasible to set $z = e^{i\ x}$ and the Euler's relation $\displaystyle \sin x = \frac{e^{i\ x} - e^{- i\ x}}{2\ i}$ so that the integral becomes...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{2\ \pi} \sqrt{1 + \sin^{2} x}\ dx = \int_{\gamma} \frac{\sqrt{1 + (\frac{z - z
^{-1}}{2\ i})^{2}}}{i\ z}\ dz\ (2)$

... being $\gamma$ the unit circle and finally solve (2) with the residue theorem. Thi approach however fails and it is requested to explain why...

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1799._xfImportMerry Christmas from Serbia


$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Attachments

  • eb191d59c14248f1e362dd5eb1d3102c.jpg
    eb191d59c14248f1e362dd5eb1d3102c.jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 145
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In theory it could be evaluated using the residue theorem. But you would need to deform the contour around the branch points at $z=1 - \sqrt{2}$ and $z= \sqrt{2}-1$.
 
Last edited:
What do you mean by fail ? , is it the case the we cannot apply the transformation ? or the integral is difficult to solve using that transformation ?
As RV indicated the square root produces two branch points for the polynomial so in case they are inside $$|z|=1$$ we have to deform the contour around them. Looking at the complexity of the answer it might be solvable by this contour but more challenging than using elliptic integrals .
 
As RV said the problem is the fact that f(z) has two brantch points inside the unit circle and that means that, unless You choose more or less complicated paths excluding them, the direct use of the residue theorem is impossible...
View attachment 1799Merry Christmas from Serbia


$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
950
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K