How Accurate Are Theories on Magnetic Lines of Force?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fairfield
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the accuracy of theories regarding magnetic lines of force, referencing foundational work by Faraday, Ampere, and Gauss, which was later synthesized by Maxwell into modern electromagnetic theory. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding historical research to evaluate new observations accurately. The critique suggests that without a solid grasp of established theories, one cannot claim to observe phenomena outside current scientific understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory
  • Knowledge of historical contributions by Faraday and Ampere
  • Basic principles of magnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Maxwell's equations in detail
  • Research the historical context of Faraday and Ampere's experiments
  • Explore modern applications of electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate critiques and advancements in magnetic field theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of magnetic theories and their historical foundations.

Fairfield
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Rewritten and placed in the thread titled, "A little critique on magnetic lines of force", in the Teory Development Forum.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cuz, I have not read your post in detail, I am guessing. I doubt that you are seeing anything different from what has been observed in the past. Do some basic research. Read carefully the works of Faraday and Ampere, they did this basic research about 200yrs ago, their work was combined with that of Gauss, by Maxwell to form our current Electro Magnetic theory. If you are not familiar with it, then you cannot know if you are seeing something different, that is, not covered by the current theory.

I doubt that you are.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the advice Integral, But I do think I see something wrong. Check my last paragraph again. I'm sticking with that.

Fairfield
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K