Other A module choice between Cosmology and Fluid Mechanics....

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a university student's decision between three physics modules: Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics, Cosmology, and Fluid Mechanics. The student has a clear interest in Condensed Matter Physics, making Thermodynamics a definite choice. The dilemma lies between Cosmology and Fluid Mechanics, both of which involve advanced mathematics and vector calculus. Fluid Mechanics is noted for its rigorous mathematical approach and practical applications, while Cosmology is described as more enjoyable with a better lecturer. The demanding nature of the Fluid Mechanics course and its perceived difficulty compared to Cosmology are also highlighted. Ultimately, the student decides to choose Fluid Mechanics, recognizing its relevance to their interests and future studies, while feeling confident in their ability to explore Cosmology independently later on.
Ryu0
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I study Mathematics and Theoretical Physics at university. Next year, I'll have a choice between three modules;
  1. Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics
  2. Cosmology
  3. Fluid Mechanics
My main interest is Condensed Matter Physics; therefore, thermodynamics and statistical physics is a given (it always was, as I'm not really convinced that studying physics can be done without a grounding in thermodynamics). Quantum mechanics is compulsory in my course and of course, I already have a grounding in Electromagnetism.

So... that leaves Cosmology and Fluid Mechanics. I actually cannot, for the life of me, decide which to pick. Perhaps it's because from the small amount I know, they seem to be very similar; both require sophisticated mathematics and deal with vector calculus, which I like. I've been told that fluid mechanics is a lot more useful than cosmology, but that's not even a factor in my decision at the moment.

Some further details:
  • Fluid mechanics will be taught with much greater mathematical rigour than cosmology; that's great! However, the students I know who're studying cosmology say it's supposed to be more enjoyable.
  • The lecturer for fluid mechanics is very demanding and apparently hard to deal with whilst the lecturer for cosmology is known to be excellent and easy to get along with. I've actually dealt with both before and I think they're both great; I actually like how brutal the fluid mechanics lecturer is. Both are experts in their fields.
  • The modules are undergraduate level, but tensor calculus is used in both. Fluid mechanics is, according to more senior students, apparently much harder than cosmology, but everything is difficult for me and I get through it all the same.
So, all you physicists and mathematicians on this great forum; would you be so kind as to sell me your favourite of two? What are the pros and cons of either?

Thank you for reading!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Go with the friendly Cosmology prof if you're not concerned about applicability or being the one to solve the Navier Stokes million dollar millennial challenge although fluid mechanics could be applied to cosmology at some point.

However, I think you decided that already.

You could also read the Frost poem, "The Road Not Taken" for inspiration:

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/resources/learning/core-poems/detail/44272
 
  • Like
Likes Ryu0
If you are interested in condensed matter you should do fluid mechanics. It's useful for a lot of things/research and the math techniques you learn should be helpful. People have recently been studying hydronamical regimes in strongly interacting metals.
 
  • Like
Likes Ryu0
Thank you both for the advice! That was a great poem, jedishrfu; I admit I completely misunderstood it at first but with a bit of research, its meaning got through.

I'll be going with fluid mechanics. From what it looks like? I'm probably going to be one of three people taking the module, but that barely matters. It's not like choosing fluids automatically bans me from ever studying cosmology; I have no qualms studying independently.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Back
Top