A practical question from a resident in Tokyo

  • Thread starter Thread starter britinjapan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Practical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around living in Tokyo in the context of radiation exposure and safety following a nuclear incident. Participants raise questions about radiation levels, water safety, and evacuation criteria, seeking advice and insights from others in the community.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that radiation levels are around 0.20-0.30 micro sieverts per hour and asks what precautions should be taken, such as covering skin or changing clothes at the door.
  • Concerns are raised about the presence of Iodine 131 and Cesium 134 and 137 in drinking water, with a request for advice on this issue.
  • Another participant inquires about the implications of discovering Plutonium in the topsoil near the plant, seeking clarification on its consequences.
  • A participant mentions the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's recommended annual occupational dosage limits, suggesting that levels below 6 microSieverts per hour are tolerable, but emphasizes the need for precautions if spending time outdoors.
  • There is a question about what triggers would necessitate moving south or evacuating, particularly if the Japanese government expands the evacuation radius around the plant.
  • One participant suggests monitoring US government evacuation advice, noting discrepancies in radiation reporting between the US and Japanese governments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of concern regarding radiation exposure and safety measures, with no consensus on the best course of action or the implications of the discovered Plutonium. Multiple competing views on evacuation criteria and government advisories are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific radiation levels and government recommendations, but there are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions behind these levels and the definitions of safety thresholds. The discussion does not resolve the uncertainties surrounding the implications of radiation exposure and the presence of Plutonium.

britinjapan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I discovered your site yesterday, and have been fortunate to find such fine quality and detailed information on the Japan situation. Forgive me if I missed this already, but I have a few questions on actually living in Tokyo - I would much appreciate any responses:

1. The radiation level seems to be around 0.20-0.30 micro sieverts per hour - although I read this is not high, what precautions should I be taking? Covering skin (bald head!); changing clothes at door (keeping outdoor clothing separate etc)?

2. Regarding the levels of drinking water, Iodine 131 and Cesium 134 and 137 are currently in drinking water (http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/emergency/monitoring.tokyo-eiken.go.jp/monitoring/w-past_data.html). What is anyones advice?

3. I just recently fould out about MOX in reactor 3 - is there anything else I should be looking out for - a few words on Plutonium for a novice would be appreciated.

4. Lastly - at what trigger does one move south or out? If the Japanese Government move the radius around the plant to 100km, this is obviously a sign that the situation is getting a lot worse? An explosion? Any other things to look out for, or levels to be monitored?

Any comments and views appreciated for a novice and resident in Tokyo.

Once again, thanks for your access to your fine site.

Regards,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
britinjapan said:
1. The radiation level seems to be around 0.20-0.30 micro sieverts per hour - although I read this is not high, what precautions should I be taking? Covering skin (bald head!); changing clothes at door (keeping outdoor clothing separate etc)?

4. Lastly - at what trigger does one move south or out? If the Japanese Government move the radius around the plant to 100km, this is obviously a sign that the situation is getting a lot worse? An explosion? Any other things to look out for, or levels to be monitored?

Any comments and views appreciated for a novice and resident in Tokyo.
The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission recommended annual occupational dosage limits for adults is given in

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1736/

Specifically see page 3-38 at

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=33280&d=1300574969

The recommended maximum annual occupational dose is 5 rem, or 50 milliSieverts. This is equivalent to about 6 microSieverts per hour. Dose rates less than this are tolerable.

If you spend a lot of time outdoors, cover your head, or risk getting sunburned.

Bob S
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Many thanks. Could anyone comment on the implications/consequences that Plutonium has now been discovered in the top soil near the plant? Thanks
 
You might keep track of the US government's evacuation advice to US nationals living in Japan. As the disaster unfolded they advised US citizens within a 50 mile radius to evacuate, as opposed to the Japanese government's 12 km or so (I may be remembering the numbers wrong).

There is reason to suspect that we are reporting radiation levels and risks more accurately than the Japanese government (remember when our government said the reactor fire wasn't out after the Japanese said it was, and when they looked again they did find fire?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
506K