A Proton is fired from far away towards the nuclues of a mercury Atom

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a proton being fired towards the nucleus of a mercury atom, with specific parameters given such as the speed of the proton and the diameter of the nucleus. The context is rooted in electrostatics and kinematics, focusing on the interactions between charged particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy at the closest approach, with attempts to express this in terms of known variables. Questions arise regarding the charges of the particles involved and how to properly represent them in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some guidance has been offered regarding the formulation of the energy equations and the need to clarify the variables involved. Participants are exploring the necessary steps to isolate the separation distance, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach or final outcome yet.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need to convert charge values into standard units, and the discussion reflects uncertainty about the specific values to use for the charges of the particles involved.

Blitzp22
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A proton is fired from far away towards the nucleus of a mercury atom. Mercury is element number 80, and the diameter of the nucleus is 14.0 fm. If the proton is fired at a speed of 32100000 m/s, what is its closest approach to the surface of the nucleus (in fm)? Assume that the nucleus remains at rest.


Homework Equations



U=kq1q2/r
kinematic equation
K = 1/2 m v^2

The Attempt at a Solution



So I got this far
1/2(1.67E-27)(3.21E7)^2=(9E9)(q1)(q2)/7fm

but I don't know what to do about the q1 and q2 to get my final answer. Hmmmm toughy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The q's are the charges on the nucleii. You can look them up on a periodic table. Remember, the charge shown on the table is in terms of electron or proton charges which you must convert into the standard unit of Coulombs. No doubt you have the charge of an electron in one of your lists.

Your calc is right, but difficult for me or your teacher to understand. Maybe you, too. You really should start with a general statement that shows your method of attack. Something like this:

Kinetic energy far out is entirely converted to potential energy at the closest approach
or KE far out = PE @ turnaround
 
yeah but in response to Delphi51's comments, then what are searching for? you would've filled all the unknowns in the equation
 
Welcome to PF, richnut.
You would still be looking for the separation distance, which is the r in the original post. It just makes more sense to write:
KE far out = PE @ turnaround
1/2 m v^2 = kq1q2/r
The first step clarifies what the second means. Then you go on to solve for r.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K