A quesion about Field of quotients

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wowolala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A commutative ring with unity that is not an integral domain cannot be embedded in a field. This is established by the theorem of Field of Quotients, which states that if a ring R could be contained in a field F, then R must be isomorphic to an integral domain D. Since R is not an integral domain, this leads to a contradiction, confirming that such an embedding is impossible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutative rings with unity
  • Knowledge of integral domains
  • Familiarity with the theorem of Field of Quotients
  • Basic concepts of ring theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of integral domains and their implications
  • Explore the theorem of Field of Quotients in detail
  • Learn about the structure of fields and their relationship to rings
  • Investigate examples of commutative rings that are not integral domains
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, students studying ring theory, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of fields and rings.

wowolala
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
The question is to explain why a commutative ring with unity that is not an integral domain cannot be contained in a field.

actually, every field is an integral domain. but above question wants us to compare with thm of Field of quotients..


first , i suppose the R is contained in a field, therefore by thm, can i conlude that R is isomorphic to an integral domain D, moreover, R is an integral domain, so we have contradicton with assumption..


am i right?


can anyone help me ?

thx so much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you could embed R into a field F, then take a, b in R such that ab = 0 but a and b are nonzero. Then they have the same property in F, which is bad. So your explanation is fine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
988
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K