MHB A question about surjective module-homomorphisms

  • Thread starter Thread starter steenis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surjective
steenis
Messages
312
Reaction score
18
I have the following question about surjective module-homomorphisms.

Let $f:A \longrightarrow B$ be a surjective $R$-homomorphism between $R$-modules $A$ and $B$.
Let $S, T$ be submodules of $A$ and let $X, Y$ be submodules of $B$.

I can prove that in general
$$f(S+T)=f(S)+f(T)$$
and in general
$$f^{-1}(X)+ f^{-1}(Y) \subseteq f^{-1}(X+Y)$$
If $f$ is surjective we can combine these two, and we have
$$f(f^{-1}(X)+ f^{-1}(Y))=f f^{-1}(X)+f f^{-1}(Y)=X+Y$$
But I need this:
$$f^{-1}(X)+ f^{-1}(Y)=f^{-1}(X+Y)$$
given that $f$ is surjective.

I cannot find the proof and I do not know if it is true, can somebody help me to prove this or give a counterexample or give a reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
steenis said:
I have the following question about surjective module-homomorphisms.

Let $f:A \longrightarrow B$ be a surjective $R$-homomorphism between $R$-modules $A$ and $B$.
Let $S, T$ be submodules of $A$ and let $X, Y$ be submodules of $B$.

I can prove that in general
$$f(S+T)=f(S)+f(T)$$
and in general
$$f^{-1}(X)+ f^{-1}(Y) \subseteq f^{-1}(X+Y)$$
If $f$ is surjective we can combine these two, and we have
$$f(f^{-1}(X)+ f^{-1}(Y))=f f^{-1}(X)+f f^{-1}(Y)=X+Y$$
But I need this:
$$f^{-1}(X)+ f^{-1}(Y)=f^{-1}(X+Y)$$
given that $f$ is surjective.

I cannot find the proof and I do not know if it is true, can somebody help me to prove this or give a counterexample or give a reference?
If $a\in f^{-1}(X+Y)$ then $f(a) = x+y$, for some $x$ in $X$ and $y$ in $Y$. If $f$ is surjective then $x = f(b)$ and $y = f(c)$, for some $b,c\in A$. If $d = a-b-c$ then $f(d) = f(a) - f(b) - f(c) = 0.$ It follows that $b+d \in f^{-1}(X)$, and then $a = (b+d) + c \in f^{-1}(X)+ f^{-1}(Y)$.

That shows that $ f^{-1}(X+Y) \subseteq f^{-1}(X)+ f^{-1}(Y)$. You have already shown the reverse inequality, so it follows that $ f^{-1}(X+Y) = f^{-1}(X)+ f^{-1}(Y)$.
 
Thank you very much, This is a great help !
 
Doe anyone know references (books or online) in which this kind of "fomulae" of modules (or groups or rings, ...) are listed and maybe proved ?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
976
Replies
5
Views
961
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
710
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
752
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
934