Undergrad A question on Bose enhancement & Pauli blocking

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of transition rates for bosons and fermions, highlighting the enhancement of bosonic transition rates due to Bose-Einstein statistics and the suppression of fermionic rates due to Fermi-Dirac statistics, specifically referencing the Pauli exclusion principle. The transition rate for bosons is expressed as $$W^{boson}_{b\rightarrow a}=(n_{a}+1)W_{b\rightarrow a}$$, while for fermions it is $$W^{fermion}_{b\rightarrow a}=(1-n_{a})W_{b\rightarrow a}$$. The derivation involves the Born approximation for $$2 \rightarrow 2$$ scattering matrix elements and is linked to the Boltzmann equation. Historical context is provided, tracing the concepts back to Einstein's work in 1917 and Dirac's introduction of annihilation and creation operators in 1927.

PREREQUISITES
  • Bose-Einstein statistics
  • Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Born approximation for scattering matrix elements
  • Quantum transition amplitudes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Boltzmann equation using quantum transition amplitudes
  • Learn about the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the historical context of Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Review the use of annihilation and creation operators in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, and particle physics, will benefit from this discussion, as well as students seeking to understand the foundational principles of bosonic and fermionic behavior in quantum systems.

"Don't panic!"
Messages
600
Reaction score
8
Say I have ##n_{a}## bosons in some state ##a##, then the transition rate from some state ##b## to state ##a##, ##W^{boson}_{b\rightarrow a}##, is enhanced by a factor of ##n_{a}+1## compared to the corresponding transition probability for distinguishable particles, ##W_{b\rightarrow a}##, i.e. $$W^{boson}_{b\rightarrow a}=(n_{a}+1)W_{b\rightarrow a}$$ and so the transition rate is from a state ##b## to a state ##a## is enhanced by the number of identical bosonic particles already in the state ##a##.

Conversely, for a fermion, the transition rate is suppressed by a factor of ##1-n_{a}##, i.e. $$W^{fermion}_{b\rightarrow a}=(1-n_{a})W_{b\rightarrow a}$$

My question is, how does one derive these to relations? How does one show that transition rate for bosons are enhanced due to Bose-Einstein statistics, whereas transition rates for fermions are suppressed due to Fermi-Dirac statistics (heuristically I get that in the case of fermions it is due to the Pauli exclusion principle, so called "Pauli blocking")?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can get it in deriving the Boltzmann equation using quantum transition amplitudes. The most simple thing is to use the Born approximation for ##2 \rightarrow 2## scattering matrix elements. Then you get a collision term with the integrand
$$\propto |\mathcal{M}_{12 \leftrightarrow 34}|^2 [f_3 f_4 (1 \pm f_1)(1 \pm f_2)-f_1 f_2 (1\pm f_3)(1 \pm f_4).$$
The upper signt is for bosons the lower for fermions.

Here are some hand-written notes on this from the last winter semester ;-) (in German but with a large "formula density"):

http://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/neq-therm-WS15/quantum-boltzmann-eq-a-la-greiner-book.pdf

It's taken from one Greiner's quantum mechanics textbooks.
 
vanhees71 said:
You can get it in deriving the Boltzmann equation using quantum transition amplitudes. The most simple thing is to use the Born approximation for ##2 \rightarrow 2## scattering matrix elements. Then you get a collision term with the integrand
$$\propto |\mathcal{M}_{12 \leftrightarrow 34}|^2 [f_3 f_4 (1 \pm f_1)(1 \pm f_2)-f_1 f_2 (1\pm f_3)(1 \pm f_4).$$
The upper signt is for bosons the lower for fermions.

Here are some hand-written notes on this from the last winter semester ;-) (in German but with a large "formula density"):

http://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/neq-therm-WS15/quantum-boltzmann-eq-a-la-greiner-book.pdf

It's taken from one Greiner's quantum mechanics textbooks.

Thanks for the notes, my German isn't great, but hopefully I'll understand the equations nonetheless ;-)

So is this how it was originally derived? In texts that I've read on statistical mechanics the result is simply stated with little motivation :-/
 
That's a good question. Of course, the Bose enhancement goes as far back as to Einstein 1917, where he derived the Planck spectrum by thinking about the transition rates and detailed balance. To get the correct Planck spectrum he had to assume that additionally to induced emission, i.e., emission of a photon from an excited state triggered by the already present radiation, there exists spontaneous emission, i.e., that an excited state can spontaneously deexcite by emitting a photon, which leads to the ##1+n## factors in the collision term. The quantum derivation for photons goes back to Dirac in 1927, when he introduced the annihilation and creation operators for photons:

http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royprsa/114/767/243.full.pdf
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K