A question on electricity (potential difference)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle with charge q executing simple harmonic motion near a conducting earthed sphere. The original poster seeks to determine the voltmeter reading when the particle is at its mean position, while expressing confusion over the various factors affecting the sphere's potential.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the influence of the oscillating charge on the sphere's potential, questioning how different factors like electric and magnetic fields might affect the situation. There is also discussion about the significance of the time period T in relation to other characteristic times.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the problem's complexity. Some suggest simplifying assumptions regarding the time period T to transition the problem into a classical electrostatic context. There is acknowledgment of the need to clarify assumptions to avoid multiple interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the resistance value and the particle's velocity, as well as the implications of the time period T being either large or small on the problem's approach.

rkrthegreat
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In the situation shown in the figure a particle having charge q is executing simple harmonic motion of amplitude A and time period T in front of a CONDUCTING EARTHED SPHERE of radius R. The reading of the voltmeter when the charge particle is at its mean position(at a distance r from the sphere's centre) is?

The attempt at a solution
I'm confused about the way to approach the problem. There could be so many ways in which the sphere could get a different potential, (like due to the electric field of the charge q, due to changing magnetic field because of the oscillating charge) that I am unable to get a pinpoint solution. Do help me with this one. Look at the attached diagram for clear details.
 

Attachments

  • phy.JPG
    phy.JPG
    7 KB · Views: 522
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there any other information, such as the resistance of the resistor or how fast the particle moves?
 
Oh, I'm sorry, forgot to put that in the diagram. Take the resistance as R0. As for how fast the charge moves, the velocity at any position can be calculated, the amplitude of motion and time period being given in the question.
 
I mean, how great is T compared to some other characteristic times, such as r/c (c is speed of light), or the time for charge redistribution? You know, if T is very small compared to them, the problem will be greatly simplified.
 
Yes, take T as very small
 
Oops sorry. To simplify the problem, T should be very large, not very small. Apology :-p I guess you meant T was large, too? :biggrin:

If T is very large, we may turn the problem to a classical electrostatic one. The field formed by q is electrostatic field. Each position of q corresponds to an electrostatic image on the sphere, which comprises of 2 point charges: one at the center (q1), the other at somewhere midway between the center and q (q2). Denote V the potential of the sphere, then q1 is the one responsible for V: V=kq1/R^2, while q2 is for canceling the potential on the sphere by q, so q2 depends on x and q (I don't remember the formulas, but this can found in most books). Besides, the total charge on the sphere is q1+q2, and its time derivative is the current through the resistor, and thus: V = RoI = -Rod(q1+q2)/dt. You will arrive at a differential equation, and the rest is solving for V :smile: As I remember, the differential equation is quite crazy; but if A<<r, again, we can simplify the equation and it's solvable.
 
Last edited:
Thanks mate, I guess that's what was to be assumed, to reduce the question to a case of electrostatics. That was what I too needed to confirm, otherwise there could have been many paths to take on this question.
(I wrote take T as small because I thought you were proceeding to solve it using electromagnetics ;-) )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K