1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: A question relating to frequency i think a 10 year could do this but i cant lol

  1. Jan 5, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    I want to convert wavenumbers into wavelength. The wavenumber is 400cm-1 and i used the expression v=vbar*c to get the frequency in Hz to be 1.2*10^13, I also remembered to convert c into cm/s so that frequency is in its SI units (seconds). I then simply thought that I could use the expression lambda=c/v to get the answer i require and then multiply that answer by 1*10^9 to get my answer in nm instead of ms. I know the answer should be
    2500nm but i get 25000nm. Why do i have this factor of 10? where did it come from?

    2. Relevant equations

    i began with vbar=400 cm-1

    so then i said that



    v=1.2*10^13 Hz

    I then said that

    lambda nm=(c/v)*1*10^9


    lambda = 25000 nm when it should be 2500nm or 2.5um

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Please see above

    I know this forum is used mainly by graduates who set eachother calculus based challenges but any help for a simple folk like me would be much appreciated.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 5, 2010 #2
    You would need to convert to m/s for SI units; not cm/s.
  4. Jan 5, 2010 #3
    i thought that because vbar is equal to 400cm-1 that I would need to convert the speed of light to 3*10^10 so that its units become cm/s so that the cm cancel and leave the SI unit for frequency which is seconds? Is that where i went wrong?
  5. Jan 5, 2010 #4
    i got it now like a fool the nm is not 1*10^-9 but 1*10^-8, please post tho if u think im still wrong
  6. Jan 5, 2010 #5
    1 nm = 1*10^-9 m

    I get 25000nm as well (assuming wavenumber means 1/wavelength)
  7. Jan 5, 2010 #6
    I only read as far as the "convert to cm" and assumed that was the problem.
    I don't understand why you are using the speed of light and the wave equation to do this.
    If the wavenumber in 400 cm-1, that is all the information you need.
    This equals 40000m-1
    1/400000 = wavelength in meters
  8. Jan 5, 2010 #7
    http://imgwe.com/accessbee/27/1.png [Broken]I'm[/URL] 30 and I still don't know this. It depends where your learn. You could be learning it from asia or the Caribbean. imo.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook