A quick and simple question/clarification on circuits

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pablo1122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a circuit problem involving capacitors and resistors, specifically focusing on the behavior of current and power in a circuit with fully charged capacitors. The original poster seeks clarification on the implications of having a resistor (R5) that does not exist in the simplified circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the current through R5 and the state of the capacitors, questioning whether the absence of current implies that R5 can be disregarded in the circuit analysis.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in a back-and-forth regarding the implications of current being zero in R5, with some suggesting that the reasoning for this should be clearly articulated. There is a focus on ensuring that the reasoning aligns with the principles of circuit behavior when capacitors are fully charged.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential exam constraints regarding how to express reasoning for current and power in the context of the problem. Participants are considering how to best communicate their understanding in an exam setting.

Pablo1122
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://i.imgur.com/zXJpa9J.png
zXJpa9J.png

Homework Equations


It = vT/rT
P = I^2R

The Attempt at a Solution



http://i.imgur.com/zXJpa9J.png
This is the question at hand. I've solved them all and I have a question for part c and d. Since the capicators are fully charged, the circuit becomes:http://i.imgur.com/jGjQRLJ.png
jGjQRLJ.png

Now, assume the question on my exam was i5 on r5 for c) and r5 for d). r5 does not exist on this circuit so will the answer for c and d both be zero or just d? It seems like they both would be zero since there is no resistor but part c is throwing me off as it's saying i4 = itotal.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the capacitors are fully charged, can there be any current in R5?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pablo1122
TSny said:
When the capacitors are fully charged, can there be any current in R5?
No, since that resistor would be gone. So both c and d with be zero right? I was just confused because it says i4 = it. And in this case, if we wrote it as i5=it then we'd get a current. What would I write to say that the current is zero? Simply that since there is no longer charge going through resistor 5, the current on the resistor is zero?
 
The fact that R5 is gone in the simplified circuit is not the reason why i5 = 0. Rather, it's the other way around. The fact that there is no current in R5 is the reason why R5 doesn't appear in the simpified circuit.

To give a reason why i5 = 0, suppose i5 ≠ 0. What would that imply concerning the charges on the capacitors?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pablo1122
TSny said:
The fact that R5 is gone in the simplified circuit is not the reason why i5 = 0. Rather, it's the other way around. The fact that there is no current in R5 is the reason why R5 doesn't appear in the simpified circuit.

To give a reason why i5 = 0, suppose i5 ≠ 0. What would that imply concerning the charges on the capacitors.
Alright, so current flows until capacitors are full. Therefore, since the capacitors are full there is no more current flowing through resistor 5.

Would that be the correct answer and would that be sufficient to write on an exam as the reasoning for it?
 
Yes, I believe so.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pablo1122
TSny said:
Yes, I believe so.
Alright, so i5 = 0A.

Then for d)"Compute the power delivered to resistor r5 in the steady state"

I would just write p = I^2R = 0^2(0) = 0 right? Or just state it's 0 due to the fact that the current is equal to zero? Should I write it as 0^2(50) or 0^2(0)?

Thank you very much for your help.
 
Yes, the power dissipated in R5 is zero because i5 = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pablo1122
TSny said:
Yes, the power dissipated in R5 is zero because i5 = 0.
Perfect, thank you very much.
 
  • #10
TSny said:
Yes, the power dissipated in R5 is zero because i5 = 0.
Would it make sense if I showed that by writing

p = I^2R = 0^2(50) = 0 or should I just write the power dissipated in R5 is zero because i5 = 0. The resistor would still have a resistance of 50 ohms even if there's no current going through it right?
 
  • #11
Pablo1122 said:
Would it make sense if I showed that by writing

p = I^2R = 0^2(50) = 0 or should I just write the power dissipated in R5 is zero because i5 = 0.
Either statement seems OK to me, but writing out p = I^2R = 0^2(50) = 0 shows more explicitly why the power for R5 is zero. So, I would recommend using the more explicit argument on a test.
The resistor would still have a resistance of 50 ohms even if there's no current going through it right?
Yes, that's right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pablo1122
  • #12
TSny said:
Either statement seems OK to me, but writing out p = I^2R = 0^2(50) = 0 shows more explicitly why the power for R5 is zero. So, I would recommend using the more explicit argument on a test. Yes, that's right.
Perfect, thanks once again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K