A rational design for a personnel airlock

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noisy Rhysling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Rational
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of personnel airlocks for space missions, particularly in the context of minimizing air loss during operation. Participants explore concepts such as the Suitport system and the implications of using multiple airlocks versus a single clamshell design. The conversation touches on theoretical and practical aspects of airlock functionality and safety in space environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a clamshell airlock design that minimizes the space between the suit and the lock to reclaim air effectively.
  • Another participant identifies this concept as Suitport, noting that while air can be reclaimed by pumping it out, this requires large pumps.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the viability of using multiple airlocks, citing increased risks of catastrophic failures due to decompression.
  • One participant proposes an alternative approach where armor is positioned behind airlocks, allowing troops to cycle through while minimizing air loss.
  • Concerns are raised about the structural stress caused by cycling large volumes of air, referencing scenarios depicted in "The Martian."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best design for personnel airlocks, with multiple competing views presented regarding the use of clamshell designs versus banks of airlocks and the associated risks.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about the structural integrity of airlocks and the operational requirements for air recycling, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Noisy Rhysling
Messages
999
Reaction score
345
In The Martian we see airlocks that an SUV would fit into. Wastes air every time it's opened, even if pumped down.

I suggest we make an airlock that clamshells down on a space suit and leaves the minimum amount of room between suit and lock for air to be reclaimed from. You could have banks of these is you needed to get a lot of people out quickly. And you could have all kinds of drama around this system, priorities, etc., of use, especially if you just had one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This concept is called Suitport.

You can avoid wasting air by pumping the air out, but that needs large pumps.

Worse than the huge airlocks is the "repair" that occurs later in the movie...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ProfuselyQuarky
In my humble opinion, banks of these is not a viable solution.

Essentially, this would be a lot of openings to the outside, imho just more chances for catastrophic failures ala decompression because of xyz etc etc
 
Rocco the Stiff said:
In my humble opinion, banks of these is not a viable solution.

Essentially, this would be a lot of openings to the outside, imho just more chances for catastrophic failures ala decompression because of xyz etc etc
So put the armor behind the airlocks. Troop marches into a bay, doors close, the troops cycle through the airlocks. You could have the armor be the deck. Lower it, the personnel move onto it, it returns to position and the troops cycle out through the clamshell locks.

I agree that no solution is perfect, but airlocks like we see on Hermes are good for freight, not egress by individuals. The airlocks on the Hab are hugely wasteful in space, but the clamshell individual locks could be built into the sides of those airlocks and there would be less air to be pumped out before a crewman needed to get out to work on urgent repairs, etc. Cycling large volumes of air in and out would stress the structure, as Mr. Watney demonstrated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K