A Short Course on Quantum Matrices: Understanding Notation Basics

  • Thread starter Thread starter ^_^
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Quantum
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges faced by someone transitioning from a physics background to mathematical physics, particularly regarding unfamiliar notation in "A Short Course on Quantum Matrices" by Mitsuhiro Takeuchi. Key points include the meanings of M2 and M4 as dimensions of matrices, the circle with a cross representing the tensor product, and the Yang-Baxter equation's role in quantum mechanics. The conversation emphasizes the importance of reviewing linear algebra concepts and suggests seeking additional resources or clarification from peers to better understand the notation. Overall, with practice and exposure, the new mathematical language will become clearer and more manageable.
^_^
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I just started working with mathematical physics coming from a straight physics background. The actual work doesn't seem that hard but some of the notation is unfamilar.

The work is "A Short Course on Quantum Matrices" by Mitsuhiro Takeuchi that can be found at:

http://www.msri.org/publications/books/Book43/files/takeuchi.pdf

Definition 1.5 on p 386 presents the first display of my ignorance...what is M2, M4, what is the circle with the cross and what is the Yang Baxter equation trying to tell me?

Basically what the hell is happening on that whole page from Definition 1.5 onwards? Proposition 1.6 is just as forign to me. Don't warry about things from section 2.

Where can I find a list of all the notation that I should have picked up in an undergrad degree in maths but instead I was off doing physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\otimes is the tensor product.

M_n(k) is the nxn matrices with entries in the field k

Yang Baxter is telling you how to commute some elements in the algebra, though I forget the analogies people make.

q is an indeterminate, it measures how far way from being the ordinary case the quantum case is. Usually, the limit as q tends to 0 is the classical case.

The notation M_n is undergrad. The tensor product probably isn't in most places.

www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~wtg10

on the page of mathematical discussions, there is one called "lose your fear of tensor products".
 


First of all, don't worry - it's completely normal to feel overwhelmed by new notation when diving into a new mathematical field. The good news is that with some practice and exposure, it will become more familiar and make more sense.

To answer your specific questions, M2 and M4 refer to the dimensions of the matrices being discussed. In this case, M2 refers to 2x2 matrices and M4 refers to 4x4 matrices. The circle with the cross inside is a symbol for the tensor product, which represents the combining of two matrices. The Yang-Baxter equation is a fundamental equation in quantum mechanics that relates the behavior of particles in a multi-particle system.

As for the rest of the page and Proposition 1.6, it is discussing the properties of these matrices and how they relate to each other. It may be helpful to review some basic linear algebra concepts, as well as familiarizing yourself with some common notation used in quantum mechanics.

In terms of finding a list of notation, it may be helpful to consult a textbook or online resources specifically on quantum mechanics or linear algebra. Additionally, don't hesitate to ask for clarification from your peers or professors - they are there to help you understand and succeed in your studies. With some practice and guidance, you will soon become more comfortable with this notation and be able to apply it confidently in your work. Best of luck in your studies!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K