A Simple Crystallography Question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ian_K_Robinson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystallography
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simulating neutron scattering patterns from atomic positions using Monte-Carlo simulations in crystallography. Ian Robinson seeks clarification on the orientation of the incident beam relative to the desired 4,2,0 planes. The consensus is that the incident and diffracted beams must form the Bragg angle with the specified planes, while the azimuthal rotation within the planes is a secondary consideration. Additionally, to analyze the impact of domain distribution on peak shape, it is essential to compute diffracted intensity at angles near the nominal Bragg angle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Monte-Carlo simulations in crystallography
  • Knowledge of Bragg's law and Bragg angles
  • Familiarity with neutron scattering techniques
  • Basic principles of diffraction topography
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Monte-Carlo simulation techniques for crystallography
  • Study Bragg's law and its applications in neutron scattering
  • Learn about diffraction topography and its significance in material science
  • Investigate the effects of domain distribution on diffraction patterns
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in crystallography, physicists working with neutron scattering, and students studying material science who are interested in simulation techniques and diffraction analysis.

ian_K_Robinson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi

could anyone help with a simple crystallography question.

I am studying domain growth in crystals via Monte-Carlo simulations of atomistic models. I am writing a program to simulate the (neutron ) scattering pattern from a data-file of atomic positions via the rather brute force method of summing the scattered wave intensities at each point on a detector.

If I want to generate a pattern from a particular orientation – say 4,2,0 planes. Should the incident beam be perpendicular to the desired plane with the detector at some distance perpendicular to the incident ray or should the beam be at some arbitrary angle such as 1,1,0 with the detector oriented at 4,2,0 ?

Any suggestions very gratefully received

Ian Robinson

an ancient Ph.D candidate
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The incident and diffracted beam should form the Bragg angle with the 4,2,0 planes. There is a remaining degree of freedom, rotation within the planes, that is referred to as "azimuth". For your calculations that should not matter.

This is a very common technique used in x-ray diffraction known as diffraction topography or diffraction tomography.

If you want to see how the domain distribution affects the peak shape, then you also have to calculate the diffracted intensity for angles slightly smaller or larger than the nominal Bragg angle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
19K