A skier goes down a slope -- Ignoring friction, calculate the acceleration

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem involving incline planes and the use of Newton's second law to solve for acceleration. It is determined that the perpendicular component of acceleration is zero as the skier does not sink into or fly off the slope. The conversation also discusses the use of force diagrams and Newton's second law to systematically solve for acceleration in the x and y directions.
  • #1
mcastillo356
Gold Member
560
267
Homework Statement
A skier goes down a slope of 58% (30º). Ignoring friction, calculate:
a) The ##x## and ##y## components of the acceleration (parallel and perpendicular to the slope)
b) If it starts from repose, calculate the velocity it will have within one minute
c) Draw a diagram with all the vectors that play part in the exercise, and name them properly
Relevant Equations
Newton's second law
Basic kinematics
a) ##a_y=\dfrac{\sum{F_y}}{m}=\dfrac{N-mg\cos{\alpha}}{m}=(1-\cos{\alpha})g##
##a_x=\dfrac{\sum{F_x}}{m}=\dfrac{mg\sin{\alpha}}{m}=g\sin{\alpha}##
##a_y=(1-0,866)9,81\;m/s^2=1,31\;m/s^2##
##a_x=(0,5)9,81\;m/s^2=4,91\;m/s^2##
How can it be a perpendicular acceleration?; which coordinate system am I using?. I've solved it without no clue, just Newton's 2nd law.
b)##v_x=a_x\cdot{t}=4,91\;m/s^2\cdot{60\;s}=295\;m/s##
##v_y=a_y\cdot{t}=1,31\;m/s^2\cdot{60\;s}=78,6\;m/s##
##v=\sqrt{8,70\cdot{10^4\;m^2/s^2}+0,618\cdot{10^4\;m^2/s^2}}=305\;m/s##
Does it make sense?
c) I've found a picture (the first shown in the link's article), but I think there are too many vectors. The only vectors that play part, from my point of view, are ##\vec{N}## and weight
https://www.wikiwand.com/es/Plano_inclinado
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mcastillo356 said:
How can it be a perpendicular acceleration?; which coordinate system am I using?. I've solved it without no clue, just Newton's 2nd law.
It looks like you are using a coordinate system where the x-axis is along the incline and the y-axis perpendicular to the incline. As for why there is a perpendicular acceleration, ask yourself the question "does the skier fly off or sink into the slope?" If the answer is no, then the skier's velocity is not changing in the perpendicular direction, is it?

The diagram that you referenced does not really show too many vectors. The arrows shown in red are the actual forces acting on the block. This agrees with the diagram that you are considering. The blue arrows are the two components of the weight ##\vec G##. Strictly speaking, the diagram should show either ##\vec G## or the pair ##\vec F_1## and ##\vec F_2##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
  • #3
Thanks. But, which is the perpendicular component of the acceleration?##\vec{0}##? The exercise is part of an exam I didn't pass.
 
  • #4
Yes, the perpendicular component of the acceleration is zero. In the perpendicular direction the normal force away from the incline and the component of the weight into the incline are equal in magnitude. If they were not, the skier's velocity would change in the perpendicular direction. That means the skier would acquire a velocity either into the slope and sink in the snow or away from the slope and lose contact with the slope. This does not happen, therefore we must conclude that the acceleration component perpendicular to the slope is zero.

When you apply Newton's second law to force diagrams, it pays to be systematic as follows.
1. Add all the forces acting on the system as vectors.
Here in the perpendicular y-direction we have, from the diagram ##F_{net,y}=N-mg\cos\alpha##. In the parallel x-direction ##F_{net,x}=mg\sin\alpha##.

2. Declare the acceleration vector on the basis of additional information about the motion of the system.
Here the acceleration vector is entirely along the incline (x-direction) because of the additional information that the skier does not sink into or fly off the incline, i.e ##a_y=0## and ##a_x \neq 0##.

3. Assemble Newton's law equation in the two directions
##F_{net,x}=ma_x~\rightarrow~mg\sin\alpha=ma_x.##
##F_{net,y}=ma_y~\rightarrow~N-mg\cos\alpha=0.##

See how it works?
 
  • Wow
Likes mcastillo356
  • #5
Fantastic!. Now everything is logic. Salutes, and thanks again!
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman
  • #6
mcastillo356 said:
Fantastic!. Now everything is logic. Salutes, and thanks again!
I hope you will do better on your next exam.
 
  • Love
Likes mcastillo356
  • #7
Thanks, kuruman!
 

1. How do you calculate the acceleration of a skier going down a slope?

The acceleration of a skier going down a slope can be calculated using the formula a = (vf - vi)/t, where a is acceleration, vf is final velocity, vi is initial velocity, and t is time.

2. What is the role of friction in this scenario?

In this scenario, friction is ignored. This means that it is assumed that there is no force acting against the skier's motion, allowing us to simplify the calculation of acceleration.

3. Can you explain the concept of acceleration in this context?

Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity over time. In this context, it refers to how quickly the skier's velocity is changing as they move down the slope. A higher acceleration means the skier is gaining speed faster, while a lower acceleration means they are gaining speed more slowly.

4. How does the angle of the slope affect the skier's acceleration?

The angle of the slope can affect the skier's acceleration by changing the force of gravity acting on them. A steeper slope will have a greater force of gravity, resulting in a higher acceleration. However, in this scenario, we are ignoring the effects of friction and focusing solely on the acceleration due to gravity.

5. Is there a difference in acceleration between a skier going down a straight slope and a curved slope?

Yes, there is a difference in acceleration between a skier going down a straight slope and a curved slope. On a curved slope, the skier's path is constantly changing, and therefore their velocity is also constantly changing. This results in a varying acceleration, while on a straight slope the acceleration remains constant.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
3
Replies
97
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
629
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
230
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
956
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
989
Back
Top