I A strange definition for Hermitian operator

struggling_student
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
In lecture notes at a university (I'd rather not say which university) the following definition for Hermitian is given:

An operator is Hermitian if and only if it has real eigenvalues.


I find it questionable because I thought that non-Hermitian operators can sometimes have real eigenvalues. We can correctly say that Hermitian operators can only have real eigenvalues but that does not define the operator, right? Is it some kind of convention or is it just plain wrong? Alas the physicists often don't understand the difference between an implication and equivalence.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The statement which was give to you is wrong. One can find a non-hermitean matrix with real eigenvalues.
 
Counterexample: $$
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \\
0 & 1
\end{pmatrix} $$
has eigenvalue 1 with multiplicty 2. It's not Hermitian.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and vanhees71
A matrix is hermitian if it has real eigenvalues and you can diagonalize it with a unitary transformation. This means that if and only if matrix ##A## is hermitian, there exists a matrix ##U## such that ##U^\dagger U = UU^\dagger = 1## and ##U^\dagger A U## is a diagonal matrix with real numbers on the diagonal.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top