A Student's Guide to Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeff Ford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" is designed for the layman, requiring minimal background knowledge in physics or mathematics. Readers with a high school level understanding may find some concepts challenging, particularly as the book delves deeper into complex theories. Alternatives such as "A Briefer History of Time" and works by Simon Singh or Brian Greene are recommended for those seeking more accessible introductions to physics. Overall, while the book aims to explain modern physics, it may not be suitable for all beginners.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of physics concepts
  • Familiarity with calculus principles
  • Knowledge of scientific terminology
  • Interest in popular science literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "A Briefer History of Time" by Stephen Hawking for a simplified overview
  • Explore Simon Singh's works for beginner-friendly science topics
  • Investigate Brian Greene's books on string theory for advanced insights
  • Study "Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea" by Charles Seife for a different perspective on scientific concepts
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or mathematics, educators seeking teaching resources, and anyone interested in popular science literature will benefit from this discussion.

Jeff Ford
Messages
154
Reaction score
2
My birthday is coming up and I'm planning to ask for books. I've just returned to school and am in my first year of calculus and physics. For those of you who have read this book, is there much background required to understand it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jeff Ford said:
My birthday is coming up and I'm planning to ask for books. I've just returned to school and am in my first year of calculus and physics. For those of you who have read this book, is there much background required to understand it?

No, you don't really need to know anything.
 
Well I doubt your mum could read it...
 
wouldn't say you really need to know anything (though if you're not too confident there's always A Briefer History of Time). get some Simon Singh books he's easy to understand and to a beginner, rather informative.

If you're looking for physics and something a bit more technical, Brian Greene's books on string theory and the like are good. too many to list.

I'm reading Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea ~Charles Seife at the moment and its quite good.
 
fasterthanjoao said:
wouldn't say you really need to know anything (though if you're not too confident there's always A Briefer History of Time). get some Simon Singh books he's easy to understand and to a beginner, rather informative.
If you're looking for physics and something a bit more technical, Brian Greene's books on string theory and the like are good. too many to list.
I'm reading Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea ~Charles Seife at the moment and its quite good.

Yes, I agree. I read Zero, and it's a great book.
 
Hawkings preface claims it is intended for the layman, however being a high school physics/math student I found it fairly inaccessible as you get deeper. The pretty pictures painted are fine, but the theories discussed are quite heavy.
 
Very basic stuff, just remember this book is written for the layman.
 
I still don't think it's a bedtime read - well maybe it could perplex you to sleep.
 
JasonRox said:
Yes, I agree. I read Zero, and it's a great book.

Indeed it is! :smile:

As for the OP, I found "Universe in a nutshell" and easier read than BHOT but there is some content overlap. They were actually the first two pop-sci books I ever read.
 
  • #10
i didn't really like a brief history of time. I think that was mostly because by the time I finally got round to reading it, i'd already read several other books covering the same sort of stuff so it ended up coming across to me as, well, basic and boring.

one of the first pop-sci books I read was "time travel in einsteins universe" by Richard Gott. It was a few years ago last I read it, but I remember it being great; very well written, informative on the serious stuff and packed with plenty of useless (but interesting) information too. I felt it helped me get quite a bit more interested in my astronomy and such.

pop-sci books are great when you're just starting out IMO, I reckon that they're a really good way of finding out how interested in a field you actually are, avoiding making the wrong choices in classes at university etc. Plus they make a geek of you, d^_^b
 
  • #11
Tx said:
IVery basic stuff, just remember this book is written for the layman..

That's ridiculous. A layman is someone with little or no knowledge about the subject, not an advanced high school student doing physics, or an undergrad.
 
  • #12
Mulder said:
That's ridiculous. A layman is someone with little or no knowledge about the subject, not an advanced high school student doing physics, or an undergrad.

It's a book written for the 'nonscientist' to give an introduction to the modern theories of physics, I said that it's written for the layman cause it doesn't require years of hard maths and physics to understand the point of each chapter and what he is trying to explain in the book.
 
  • #13
brief history of time is for the laymen ...i don't know if ur a laymen or not..
well at least you know that's its about physics ...read it, its good incomprehensible fun.(joke...enjoy the book)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K