A system of linear equations can't have exactly two solutions. Why?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A system of linear equations cannot have exactly two solutions due to the properties of linearity in three-dimensional space. If two solutions (x, y, z) and (X, Y, Z) exist, any linear combination of these solutions, such as 1/2 * (x + X, y + Y, z + Z), is also a solution. Additionally, if 25 planes intersect at two points, they will meet along the entire line that connects those points, and potentially overlap to form an infinite plane of solutions. This discussion clarifies the nature of linear equations and their solutions in vector space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with vector spaces and linear combinations
  • Knowledge of matrix equations, specifically Ax = b
  • Basic concepts of three-dimensional geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear combinations in vector spaces
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of linear equations in three dimensions
  • Explore matrix equations and their solutions in linear algebra
  • Investigate the implications of overlapping planes in three-dimensional space
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, educators teaching geometry, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of systems of equations.

s3a
Messages
828
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Problem:
A system of linear equations can't have exactly two solutions. Why?

(a) If (x, y, z) and (X, Y, Z) are two solutions, what is another solution?
(b) If 25 planes meet at two points, where else do they meet?

Solution:
(a) Another solution is 1/2 * (x + X, y + Y, z + Z).
(b) If 25 planes meet at two points, they meet along the whole line through those two points.

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


Am I correct in thinking that a system of linear equations can't have exactly two solutions because a line in three-dimensional space must intersect at zero points or one point or a full line's worth of points and a plane in three-dimensional space must intersect at zero points, a line's worth of points or a plane's worth of points when attempting to answer the question asked before part (a)?

Assuming I'm correct, I know that, for example, when I say “a line's worth” it means an infinite amount of points and that that is the same thing as “a plane's worth” etc but, I'm just expressing myself like that to clarify what I am saying.

For part (a), I was thinking (x + X, y + Y, z + Z) would be another solution. Am I right? Are all answers with scalars multiplying each component and then operators summing, dividing, multiplying or subtracting those respective (transformed) components solutions as well?

For part (b), is it correct to add that not only could they meet at an entire (infinite) line's worth of points but that another case is that if the planes overlap, they can meet at an entire (infnite) plane's worth of points?

If something is unclear, tell me and, I will attempt to clarify it.

Any input would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
s3a said:

Homework Statement


Problem:
A system of linear equations can't have exactly two solutions. Why?

(a) If (x, y, z) and (X, Y, Z) are two solutions, what is another solution?
(b) If 25 planes meet at two points, where else do they meet?

Solution:
(a) Another solution is 1/2 * (x + X, y + Y, z + Z).
(b) If 25 planes meet at two points, they meet along the whole line through those two points.

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


Am I correct in thinking that a system of linear equations can't have exactly two solutions because a line in three-dimensional space must intersect at zero points or one point or a full line's worth of points and a plane in three-dimensional space must intersect at zero points, a line's worth of points or a plane's worth of points when attempting to answer the question asked before part (a)?

Assuming I'm correct, I know that, for example, when I say “a line's worth” it means an infinite amount of points and that that is the same thing as “a plane's worth” etc but, I'm just expressing myself like that to clarify what I am saying.

For part (a), I was thinking (x + X, y + Y, z + Z) would be another solution. Am I right? Are all answers with scalars multiplying each component and then operators summing, dividing, multiplying or subtracting those respective (transformed) components solutions as well?

For part (b), is it correct to add that not only could they meet at an entire (infinite) line's worth of points but that another case is that if the planes overlap, they can meet at an entire (infnite) plane's worth of points?

If something is unclear, tell me and, I will attempt to clarify it.

Any input would be greatly appreciated!

You are on the right track. But suppose the equation is x-y=1. Then A=(3,2) is a solution and B=(2,1) is a solution. I'd agree that (A+B)/2 is a solution. I would not agree that A+B is also a solution. What wrong with A+B? Can you figure out how to write down an infinite number of solutions in terms of A and B?
 
Another way if looking at it is this: Any system of linear equations can be written as a matrix equation, Ax= b, where A is the matrix of coefficients, x is a column matrix having the unkowns as entries and b is the column matrix having the 'right side' of the equations as entries.

So if X and x are two solutions. That is if Ax= b and Ax= b, then A((x+ X)/2)= (1/2)Ax+ (1/2)AX= (1/2)b+ (1/2)b= b so that (x+ X)/2 is also a solution. In fact, it is easy to see that if x and X are solutions the so it \alpha x+ \beta X any \alpha, \beta, between 0 and 1 such that \alpha+ \beta= 1.

That is, I believe, what you are saying.
 
Since the OP said, "For part (a), I was thinking (x + X, y + Y, z + Z) would be another solution. Am I right?", I don't think that was what was being said. I think with a few hints the OP might have gotten around to saying what you said.
 
What you/HallsofIvy said was not what I was saying but was what I needed to hear.

Thank you both!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K