A technical question about the amplituhedron

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nrqed
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the parameter k in the context of the amplituhedron, specifically within the equation Y = C Z^T, where Z belongs to M^+(k+m,n), C is in Gr_{\leq 0}(k,n), and Y is in Gr(k,k+m). Initially thought to represent the number of particles with negative helicities, k is clarified to be the R-charge of the SU(4) symmetry of the amplitude, indicating the number of negative helicity gluons. The authors redefine k to K = k-2 in their later work, linking the four-particle case to n=4 and k=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the amplituhedron and its mathematical framework
  • Familiarity with Grassmannian geometry and notation
  • Knowledge of SU(4) symmetry in theoretical physics
  • Basic concepts of particle physics, specifically helicity and gluons
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical properties of the Grassmannian Gr(k,n)
  • Study the implications of R-charge in SU(4) symmetry
  • Explore the paper "Into the Amplituhedron" for further insights on redefining k
  • Examine the role of negative helicity gluons in scattering amplitudes
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians studying geometry in physics, and researchers focused on scattering amplitudes and the amplituhedron framework.

nrqed
Science Advisor
Messages
3,762
Reaction score
297
One of the ways to introduce the amplituhedron is through the equation ##Y = C Z^T ## where ## Z \in M^+(k+m,n)##, ##C \in Gr_{\leq 0} (k,n)##, ##Y \in Gr(k,k+m)##.

I am trying to understand what the parameter ##k## represents. For a while, I thought that this ##k## was counting the number of particles with negative helicities but that it seems to be incorrect. Can someone help? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you. Yes, Gr is for Grassmannian. I know the math,my questions is about how the value ##k## is related to the number of negative helicity particles in the amplitude.
Thanks for your feedback.
 
nrqed said:
I am trying to understand what the parameter ##k## represents
Originally, ##k## is the R-charge of the ##SU(4)## symmetry of the amplitude, so physically it represents the number of negative helicity gluons. Note, however, that the authors later (already in "Into the Amplituhedron" paper, for example) redefine this label according to ##k \equiv K = k-2##. This is why the 4 particle case they consider corresponds to ##n=4##, ##k=0## (and an arbitrary number of loops ##L##). Here ##k## is the new ##k##, i.e. the number of negative helicity gluons minus two. For ##n=4## this is the only non-trivial amplitude to consider since all the other helicity assignments correspond to amplitudes with vanishing kinematical support.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
12K