# A tedious debate just need some backup.

• Awesome-VFX
In summary, Tony's client is trying to explain to him that the waves arriving at the beach are not always at the same frequency as the waves arriving at the ship.
Awesome-VFX
Ok, I'm having a debate about a silly concept with waves, about time/distance/speed and the quantity of waves passing different points.
2 people now fail to comprehend these basic principals of reality, and are driving me insane..

I have a client for whom I'm designing waves in Maya, who claims to believe that further out at sea, 5 waves pass per minute, but towards the shore, 6 waves pass per minute, without any new waves forming between them, as a consistent cycle; the statistics of the waves being always based on fixed values at different distances from the shore e.g. at 0 metres, they will always be moving at 20km/h, and at 200 metres from shore, will always be moving at 15km/h (random numbers).

He fails to comprehend the fact that there is a set number of waves..
He thinks that speeding them up will make more waves per minute pass one point than the previous.
He does not understand that the waves consistently accelerating based on their distance from the shore will increase the gap between them in conjunction with the increase in speed and negate the difference between the quantity of waves passing a set point.

When trying to tell a friend about this, things got even worse.. not only does my friend believe this guy's theory can physically exist, but he also believes that the waves will increase in number in a distance e.g. 200 metres from shore there may be 5 waves in 50 metres, but at 0 metres from shore there can be 6 waves in 50 metres, without them changing speed, with them all consistently remaining at 15km/h

He believes that due to the volume of the waves increasing that the distance between the waves decreases, without their speed changing at all.
I've tried explaining that distance is a part of speed, that you cannot increase the number of waves over a certain distance over time in this scenario without decreasing their speed, causing the following waves to begin to catch up, therefore negating the distance.
He believes that the centre-points of the waves are irrelevant, that their volume growing, decreasing the distances between the edges of the waves, somehow increases the number of waves between a set point, while making the waves' centre-points further apart, without any of them changing speed.. He believes this so strongly and keeps trying to explain it to me, as though he has something to explain.. it's quite frustrating.

He simply says:
"You'll have more waves over the same distance without any changes in speed, because they'd all be traveling at the same speed because you're increasing the volume of the wave."

I know it seems hopeless, I've tried explaining to him that you cannot change the distance between anything without adjusting the speed, and that the centrepoint of the wave is the only relevant information in this scenario, that the volume is not a part of the equation of speed, that increasing the volume does not decrease their distance apart in a way that is anything to do with how many waves spam a specific distance or pass a fixed point per minute.

He still thinks that the waves coming closer together by their outer edges coming closer due to the waves expanding without their speeds changing somehow puts more waves within a set distance, and that the centre-points of the waves are irrelevant to the equation because it being a fluid makes it somehow specially exempt from the laws of physics.

Anyhow, the full purpose of this post, is to simply ask for you to back me up on the obvious reality of it here, for those people to see it and maybe get some insight from others, and to make my life a little easier.
Problem is I have Aspergers, and no matter what I say in person, it's not enough. All I do is give out the facts, even stress them.. then I'm told I'm wrong and that's that. Could use some support.

Cheers,
Tony

Welcome to PF;
Being right is not the same as being convincing ...

Have a look through:
http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/resources/ocng_textbook/contents.html
Chapter 16 talks about ocean waves... at sea the frequencies are 4-6 waves per minute.

Assertions are - for the ocean:
1. a wave train can move from a fast region to a slow region and change frequency ...
2. a wave train can have two different frequencies at the same speed ...

Usually we expect the frequency to stay the same - all other things remaining equal.
However - ocean waves may not follow the simple math you get at High School - all other things may not be equal. Could there be another influence? - I'd check the basic underlying assertions that the frequency of waves arriving at the beach is, indeed, different from the frequency at sea.

Awesome-VFX said:
He believes that due to the volume of the waves increasing that the distance between the waves decreases, without their speed changing at all.
Why is he so obsessed with the speed remaining constant? It does indeed decrease. See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_shoaling
wikipedia said:
When waves enter shallow water they slow down. Under stationary conditions, the wave length is reduced. The energy flux must remain constant and the reduction in group (transport) speed is compensated by an increase in wave height (and thus wave energy density).

Basically, your friend is right only in stating that the number of waves per length increases, but the implication of that is that the speed is also reduced, so, in the end, his statement is not correct.

I can understand your frustration in trying to explain basic principles of reality to others who may not have a strong understanding of physics. It is important to remember that everyone has their own perspective and beliefs, but it is also important to base those beliefs on scientific evidence and facts. In this case, it is clear that the laws of physics, such as the relationship between speed and distance, cannot be altered or ignored.

The concept of waves, time, and distance is a fundamental part of physics and is well-studied and understood. Waves do not magically increase in number or change speed without any external factors. The speed of a wave is directly related to its wavelength and frequency, and increasing the volume of a wave does not change these fundamental characteristics.

It is also important to understand that the laws of physics apply to all objects, including fluids. Just because something is fluid does not mean it is exempt from the laws of physics. In fact, the behavior of fluids is well-studied and can be accurately predicted using these laws.

I would suggest providing your friends with some scientific resources or demonstrations that can help them understand the concepts better. It may also be helpful to have a calm and open-minded discussion, rather than trying to prove one person wrong and the other person right. At the end of the day, the laws of physics are not up for debate, and it is important to base our beliefs on scientific evidence. I hope this helps and good luck with your debate.

## What is a tedious debate?

A tedious debate is a long, drawn-out discussion or argument that can be tiresome and unproductive.

## Why do debates become tedious?

Debates can become tedious when the participants are unable to reach a resolution or when the same points are repeated over and over again without any new insights or perspectives being shared.

## How can backup help in a tedious debate?

Having backup in a debate can provide additional evidence or support for arguments, which can help move the discussion forward and prevent it from becoming stagnant.

## What are some examples of backup in a debate?

Examples of backup in a debate can include statistics, research studies, expert opinions, personal experiences, and historical evidence.

## How can one effectively use backup in a debate?

To effectively use backup in a debate, it is important to choose reliable and relevant sources, present the information in a clear and organized manner, and use it to strengthen your arguments rather than overpowering or dismissing the opposing viewpoint.

• Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
417
• Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
35
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Cosmology
Replies
2
Views
1K
• Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
25
Views
975
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
311
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
611