A tire sliding about a fixed point

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two tires with a weighted beam attached, where one tire is fixed and the other slides 90 degrees. The task is to determine the force required to slide the tire to this angle, considering the uneven weight distribution of the beam.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces involved, including normal force, frictional force, and gravitational force. Questions arise about how to calculate the normal force and the impact of the beam's weight on this calculation. There are inquiries about the setup, including the orientation of the asphalt and the beam's attachment to the tires.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the problem, with some providing guidance on calculating forces and moments. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the original question regarding the setup and forces involved, particularly concerning the movement of both tires.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific numerical values and the need for clarity on the physical arrangement of the tires and beam. The discussion includes considerations of friction and the effects of wind on the system.

Zauce
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are two tires separated by a few feet, with a weighted beam attached on top of them. The beam's weight isn't distributed evenly. One of the tires is a fixed point. The other tire slides (doesn't roll) 90 degrees. How do you determine the force required to slide the tire all the way to this angle (or distance)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Zauce! :smile:

(is that all the information … no numbers?)
Zauce said:
There are two tires separated by a few feet, with a weighted beam attached on top of them. The beam's weight isn't distributed evenly. One of the tires is a fixed point. The other tire slides (doesn't roll) 90 degrees. How do you determine the force required to slide the tire all the way to this angle (or distance)?

What do you think? How many forces are involved? :smile:
 
That's not all the numbers. I know the applied force on top of each tire and the coefficient of friction between rubber and asphalt, and the center of gravity of the beam. It's been a couple of years since I've taken Dynamics, so I'm having a tough time coming up with which equation to use. I know I need the normal force, frictional force, gravitational force. Can you help me with this?
 
Zauce said:
I know I need the normal force, frictional force, gravitational force.

ok, once you know the normal force, that tells you the friction force, and that tells you the work done.

So find the normal force first … how can you do that? :smile:
 
The normal force would just be mass x gravity, I think. Correct?
 
Nooo … what about the weight of the beam?
 
The normal force would equal m x g + weight of beam??
 
Don't forget that the beam is supported at two points …

so you'll have to take moments to find how much of its weight is supported at each tyre. :wink:
 
Ok, I've taken the moment to find the weight of the beam at each tire location. So, I should have all the numbers to find the normal forces at both points. Whats the next step?
 
  • #10
(just got up :zzz: … )
Zauce said:
Ok, I've taken the moment to find the weight of the beam at each tire location. So, I should have all the numbers to find the normal forces at both points. Whats the next step?

Can you clarify the original question …

Is the asphalt (that the tyre is on) horizontal? Is the beam fixed to a fixed point on the tyre, so that the beam increases in slope as the tyre turns?

Does the beam start horizontal, and at the top of the tyre (because if it does, I don't see why the tyre should start sliding)?
 
  • #11
Yes, the ashphalt is horizontal. The beam is attached to the top of each tire, and the back tire is a fixed point. I'm trying to figure out how much wind it took to blow the front tire 90 degrees. I drew up a couple of diagrams, and will attach both. The first one is a side view and I will post the view from the top in just a minute.
 

Attachments

  • DSC02801.jpg
    DSC02801.jpg
    7.7 KB · Views: 439
  • #12
Here is a view from above.
 

Attachments

  • DSC02802.JPG
    DSC02802.JPG
    29.9 KB · Views: 469
  • #13
Zauce said:
Ok, I've taken the moment to find the weight of the beam at each tire location. So, I should have all the numbers to find the normal forces at both points. Whats the next step?

ok, from the normal force you can calculate the friction force, and from that you can calculate the work done. :smile:
 
  • #14
After I find the normal force and friction force, would I just add both of them up? Would that be what I'm looking for to find the force required by the wind to push the beam the distance? Thanks a lot for the help.
 
  • #15
Zauce said:
After I find the normal force and friction force, would I just add both of them up?

No!

The normal force is vertical. The wind is horizontal. The friction force is horizontal.

So … ? :smile:
 
  • #16
So, the wind force needed to push the beam and tires would just have to be greater than the friction force.
 
  • #17
Zauce said:
So, the wind force needed to push the beam and tires would just have to be greater than the friction force.

(just got up :zzz: …)

Yes, when the only opposing force is friction, the minimum force needed is just greater than the friction force. :smile:

But both tyres? You didn't say anything about them both moving.

Is the other tyre being forced to rotate "on the spot" also … because that will require extra force, won't it (if there's friction, and if the area of contact is not negligible)?

What exactly is the question? :confused:
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K