A uniformly charged rotating sphere does not radiate, why not?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A uniformly charged rotating sphere with a constant charge distribution does not radiate due to the time-independent nature of its charge and current distributions. The angular velocity, denoted as ##\vec{\omega}=\text{const}##, leads to static electric fields and zero magnetic fields, resulting in a zero Poynting vector. This phenomenon is analogous to direct current (DC) flowing through a loop of wire, where radiation occurs only during changes in the current. The Jefimenko solutions to electromagnetism confirm that only terms proportional to the time derivatives of charge density (##\dot \rho##) and current density (##\dot{\mathbf J}##) contribute to radiation, both of which are zero in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically static fields
  • Familiarity with the concepts of charge density (##\rho##) and current density (##\mathbf{J}##)
  • Knowledge of angular momentum in rotating systems
  • Basic comprehension of the Jefimenko solutions in electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Jefimenko equations to understand their implications for radiation in static fields
  • Explore the relationship between charge density and current density in rotating systems
  • Investigate the conditions under which electromagnetic radiation occurs in dynamic systems
  • Review the principles of static electric and magnetic fields in classical electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and researchers interested in the behavior of charged rotating bodies and their radiation properties.

wykk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
The problem says I have a spherically symmetric spinning constant charge distribution of charge Q and angular momentum w; I saw two possible explanations but none of them has made me realize why it is zero, one mentions thata constant w somehow implies a constant E which would mean there is no B and poynting vector would be zero.
Another mentions that the charge distribution rho is constant therefore J the current density is too and B becomes zero but I don't know how to derive an expression that relates B and J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @wykk and welcome to PF.

If this is a homework problem, it should be posted under Introductory Physics Homework with the template provided. Please read the forum homework help guidelines before posting there. I would also strongly recommend posting the exact description of the question as given to you. Providing links to the explanations that you saw would also be helpful as it is possible that you may have misconstrued what you read.
 
It's because the charge and current distributions are time-independent. Thus you also have static fields. I suppose it's meant that the angular velocity ##\vec{\omega}=\text{const}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
vanhees71 said:
It's because the charge and current distributions are time-independent. Thus you also have static fields. I suppose it's meant that the angular velocity ##\vec{\omega}=\text{const}##.
It's the equivalent of DC passing round a loop of wire; no radiation except at switch on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Look at the form of the Jefimenko solutions, which are the solutions to electromagnetism in free space. Only the terms that go as ##1/|r-r'|## contribute to the radiation field, all three of these terms are proportional to ##\dot \rho## or ##\dot{\mathbf J}## which are both zero in the case of a spherically symmetric spinning body (or even an axially symmetric one).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
32K