A uniformly charged rotating sphere does not radiate, why not?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why a uniformly charged rotating sphere does not radiate electromagnetic waves. The problem involves concepts from electromagnetism, particularly focusing on charge distributions, current densities, and their implications for radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of a constant angular velocity and its relationship to electric and magnetic fields. There are attempts to connect the constancy of charge and current distributions to the absence of radiation, with some questioning how to derive the relationship between magnetic field and current density.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various perspectives being shared. Some participants have provided insights into the nature of static fields and the conditions under which radiation occurs. There is no explicit consensus, but several lines of reasoning are being explored regarding the time-independence of the charge and current distributions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of adhering to forum guidelines for homework posts and suggest including the original problem statement for clarity. There is an emphasis on understanding the physical principles rather than deriving a solution directly.

wykk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
The problem says I have a spherically symmetric spinning constant charge distribution of charge Q and angular momentum w; I saw two possible explanations but none of them has made me realize why it is zero, one mentions thata constant w somehow implies a constant E which would mean there is no B and poynting vector would be zero.
Another mentions that the charge distribution rho is constant therefore J the current density is too and B becomes zero but I don't know how to derive an expression that relates B and J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @wykk and welcome to PF.

If this is a homework problem, it should be posted under Introductory Physics Homework with the template provided. Please read the forum homework help guidelines before posting there. I would also strongly recommend posting the exact description of the question as given to you. Providing links to the explanations that you saw would also be helpful as it is possible that you may have misconstrued what you read.
 
It's because the charge and current distributions are time-independent. Thus you also have static fields. I suppose it's meant that the angular velocity ##\vec{\omega}=\text{const}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
vanhees71 said:
It's because the charge and current distributions are time-independent. Thus you also have static fields. I suppose it's meant that the angular velocity ##\vec{\omega}=\text{const}##.
It's the equivalent of DC passing round a loop of wire; no radiation except at switch on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Look at the form of the Jefimenko solutions, which are the solutions to electromagnetism in free space. Only the terms that go as ##1/|r-r'|## contribute to the radiation field, all three of these terms are proportional to ##\dot \rho## or ##\dot{\mathbf J}## which are both zero in the case of a spherically symmetric spinning body (or even an axially symmetric one).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
32K