Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the bankruptcy filing of A123 Systems, a company that received significant government funding. Participants explore the implications of government-sponsored companies, the challenges of ensuring their success, and the broader context of renewable energy investments.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants note that A123 Systems received substantial grants and tax incentives but still filed for bankruptcy, raising questions about the effectiveness of government support.
- Others argue that not all government-sponsored companies fail, suggesting that the outcomes can vary widely based on circumstances.
- One participant shares personal experiences with NYSERDA, emphasizing that funding does not guarantee success and that many proposals do not achieve their intended goals.
- Concerns are raised about the government's ability to choose successful companies, with some suggesting that the decision-making process is influenced by political goals rather than sound business practices.
- Participants discuss the challenges of assessing the viability of startups, particularly those with limited assets beyond their ideas.
- Some express frustration over the perceived disconnect between government funding decisions and effective business outcomes, particularly in the renewable energy sector.
- There are humorous remarks about personal financial losses related to A123, reflecting the emotional impact of investment decisions on individuals.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the effectiveness of government funding for companies like A123 Systems. Disagreement exists regarding the role of government in supporting industries and the criteria for evaluating the success of funded projects.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the complexity of assessing the viability of startups, the influence of political agendas on funding decisions, and the uncertainty surrounding the outcomes of government-sponsored initiatives.