Hi, this question is related to global and local SU(n) gauge theories.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

First of all, some notation: ##A## will be the gauge field of the theory (i.e: the 'vector potential' in the case of electromagnetic interactions) also known as 'connection form'.

In components: ##A_\mu## can be expanded in terms of the basis given by the generators $F_a$ of a SU(n) group using some coefficients (or components) ##A_\mu^a## so one can write ##A_\mu=A_\mu^aF_a##.

As you can see in the image I uploaded (from the book "An elementary primer for Gauge theory") one can identify ##A_\mu^a## wih the partial derivatives of the parameters ## \theta^a ## (in the last line you have ##A_\mu=\partial_\mu\theta^a\,F_a##) wich parametrize the infinitesimal ammount of transformation that is made by the operator ## U(dx) ## on an arbitrary vectoru.

The question is: If the transformation is global, i.e: ## \theta^a\neq f(x) ##, then... ## A_\mu^a=0 ## implies that is impossible to deffine a connection?.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I ##A_\mu^a=0## in global gauge symmetries ?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**