1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

About Kinetic energy of circular motion

  1. Dec 3, 2007 #1
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 3, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The bob is assumed to "barely make it around the circle." This tells us that the bob's speed is almost zero at the top of the circle. Since the speed is so small up there, the kinetic energy would be very, very close to zero. This means that the approximation of kinetic energy = 0 at the top of the loop is justified.
  4. Dec 3, 2007 #3
    Hi, thanks, but I have updated my question for including a question B for compare.
    May I know why in question B, we cannot assume this?
  5. Dec 3, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I am not sure what you are asking. Where in the solution to this second problem would you like to make that assumption? The pendulum bob is not going around the top of the loop.
  6. Dec 3, 2007 #5
    Hi, for your reference, this is the question for pendulum bob that I asked before:

    The pendulum is going around to the top of the loop with respect the "peg".
  7. Dec 3, 2007 #6

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    For a bob attached to a flexible string to make it around the loop, the string must have some tension in it at all points. Not so for the rigid rod. In order for the string to have some slight non-zero tension at the top of the loop, a minimum speed is required.
  8. Dec 3, 2007 #7
    I see, a simple keyword make so much different! Thanks a lot :)
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook