How do we prove that a nonzero nilpotent Lie algebra has a nontrivial center?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a nonzero nilpotent Lie algebra, denoted as ##L##, has a nontrivial center, expressed as ##Z(L) \neq 0##. Participants reference J. E. Humphreys' "Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory," specifically Proposition 3.2. The proof involves demonstrating that if ##L## is nilpotent, then there exists a vector ##x \in \mathfrak{g}^{n-1} \backslash \{0\}##, which implies ##x## is in the center, establishing that ##Z(L) \neq 0##. Additionally, the conversation touches on the relationship between nilpotent and solvable Lie algebras, confirming that every nilpotent Lie algebra is indeed solvable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nilpotent Lie algebras and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of the center of a Lie algebra, ##Z(L)##
  • Knowledge of quotient structures in algebra, specifically ##\mathfrak{g} / Z(\mathfrak{g})##
  • Basic principles of induction in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Proposition 3.2 in "Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory" by J. E. Humphreys
  • Learn about the structure and properties of nilpotent and solvable Lie algebras
  • Explore the concept of the center of a Lie algebra and its implications
  • Investigate induction techniques in algebraic proofs, particularly in the context of Lie algebras
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying Lie algebras, particularly those interested in the properties of nilpotent and solvable structures.

HDB1
Messages
77
Reaction score
7
Please, in the book of Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory J. E. Humphreys p.12, I have a question:

Proposition. (3.2)
. Let ##L## be a Lie algebra.

(c) If ##L## is nilpotent and nonzero, then ##Z(L) \neq 0##.

how we prove this,

Thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dear @fresh_42 , if you could help, I would appreciate that, :heart:🥹
 
Let's start a little tutoring so that you get used to these calculations. Start with what you have.

##L## is nilpotent. Means what?
 
if ##
\mathfrak{g}^0=\mathfrak{g}, \mathfrak{g}^1=[\mathfrak{g}, \mathfrak{g}], \mathfrak{g}^2=\left[\mathfrak{g}, \mathfrak{g}^1\right], \ldots, \mathfrak{g}^i=\left[\mathfrak{g}, \mathfrak{g}^{i-1}\right]
##
A Lie algebra ##\mathfrak{g}## is called a nilpotent if ##\mathfrak{g}^n=0##,
 
HDB1 said:
if ##
\mathfrak{g}^0=\mathfrak{g}, \mathfrak{g}^1=[\mathfrak{g}, \mathfrak{g}], \mathfrak{g}^2=\left[\mathfrak{g}, \mathfrak{g}^1\right], \ldots, \mathfrak{g}^i=\left[\mathfrak{g}, \mathfrak{g}^{i-1}\right]
##
A Lie algebra ##\mathfrak{g}## is called a nilpotent if ##\mathfrak{g}^n=0##,
Yes. And that means if we write it out
$$
[\mathfrak{g},\underbrace{[\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},[\ldots[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]\ldots ]]]]}_{=:\mathfrak{g}^{n-1}}]=0
$$
If we pick the smallest ##n## such that ##g^{n}=0## then ##g^{n-1}\neq 0## and we can pick a vector ##x\in \mathfrak{g}^{n-1}\backslash \{0\}.##

What can we say about ##x##?
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: HDB1
fresh_42 said:
Yes. And that means if we write it out
$$
[\mathfrak{g},\underbrace{[\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},[\ldots[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]\ldots ]]]]}_{=:\mathfrak{g}^{n-1}}]=0
$$
If we pick the smallest ##n## such that ##g^{n}=0## then ##g^{n-1}\neq 0## and we can pick a vector ##x\in \mathfrak{g}^{n-1}\backslash \{0\}.##

What can we say about ##x##?
##x## will be in the centre, means ##Z(g)\neq 0##?

thanks a lot, :heart:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and malawi_glenn
Please, @fresh_42 , what is about this :
If ##\mathfrak{g} / Z(\mathfrak{g})## is nilpotent, then ##\mathfrak{g}## is nilpotent .
I know the idea, but how we can move from to ##\mathfrak{g} / Z(\mathfrak{g})## to ##\mathfrak{g}## to prove it is nilpotent,

Thanks in advance, :heart:
 
Please, @fresh_42 , in general how we can prove that every nilpotent is solvable?

the opposite direction is not true, because the upper triangular matrix is nilpotent but not solvable.

Thanks in advance, :heart:
 
HDB1 said:
Please, @fresh_42 , what is about this :
If ##\mathfrak{g} / Z(\mathfrak{g})## is nilpotent, then ##\mathfrak{g}## is nilpotent .
I know the idea, but how we can move from to ##\mathfrak{g} / Z(\mathfrak{g})## to ##\mathfrak{g}## to prove it is nilpotent,

Thanks in advance, :heart:
This is again about the quotient's multiplication rules. We have that ##\mathfrak{g} / Z(\mathfrak{g})## is nilpotent, so ##\left(\mathfrak{g} / Z(\mathfrak{g})\right)^n=\{\bar 0\}.## So what is ##\bar 0 \in \mathfrak{g}/Z(\mathfrak{g})##? It is the set ##\bar 0 =0+ Z(\mathfrak{g})=Z(\mathfrak{g}).## We also have
$$
[\mathfrak{g}/Z(\mathfrak{g})\, , \,\mathfrak{g}/Z(\mathfrak{g})]=[\mathfrak{g}\, , \,\mathfrak{g}]+Z(\mathfrak{g})
$$
This means that ##0+Z(\mathfrak{g})=\bar 0=\left(\mathfrak{g} / Z(\mathfrak{g})\right)^n= \mathfrak{g}^n+ Z(\mathfrak{g})## or in other words ##\mathfrak{g}^n\subseteq Z(\mathfrak{g}).## But if ##\mathfrak{g}^n## is in the center of ##\mathfrak{g}## then
$$
\mathfrak{g}^{n+1} =[\mathfrak{g}\, , \,\mathfrak{g}^n]\subseteq [\mathfrak{g}\, , \,Z(\mathfrak{g}^n)]=\{0\}
$$
and ##\mathfrak{g}## is nilpotent.
 
  • #10
HDB1 said:
Please, @fresh_42 , in general how we can prove that every nilpotent is solvable?

the opposite direction is not true, because the upper triangular matrix is nilpotent but not solvable.

Thanks in advance, :heart:
We prove that ##L^{(n)}\subseteq L^{n}.## If the RHS gets zero (nilpotency) for some ##n## so does the LHS (solvability).

The proof is formally by induction.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: HDB1

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K