About normalization of periodic wave function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of periodic potentials. It establishes that for wave functions defined over a periodic potential, normalization should be performed over one period, as the integral over the entire real line does not converge. The conversation also clarifies that momentum eigenstates are generalized functions, normalized to a delta distribution, and introduces the concept of Bloch states, which are relevant for particles in periodic potentials. The normalization of Bloch states is contingent upon the choice of the unit cell.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions and normalization.
  • Familiarity with periodic potentials and their implications in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of momentum eigenstates and their representation in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic concepts of solid-state physics, especially Bloch states and crystal lattices.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the normalization of wave functions in periodic potentials using the integral over one period.
  • Learn about momentum eigenstates and their normalization to delta distributions.
  • Explore Bloch states in solid-state physics, particularly in the context of periodic lattices.
  • Investigate the Fourier transformation between position-space and momentum-space wave functions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, solid-state physicists, and researchers interested in the behavior of particles in periodic potentials and the normalization of wave functions.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Hi all,
I am reading something on wave function in quantum mechanics. I am thinking a situation if we have particles distributed over a periodic potential such that the wave function is periodic as well. For example, it could be a superposition of a series of equal-amplitude plane waves with different wave number (some positive and some negative) so to give a form of ##f(x+2\pi)=f(x)##. In this case, I wonder how do we normalize the wave function. I try the following but it almost give something close to zero because the integral gives something very large

##
f [\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|f|^2dx]^{-1}
##

But since it is periodic, do you think I should normalize the wave function with the normalization factor computed in one period as follows:

##
\int_{-\pi}^{+\pi}|f|^2dx
##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's very simple to answer. Since ##\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x |f(x)|^2## doesn't exist in this case, it is not a wave function that describes a physical state, and thus you never ever need to consider it let alone normalize it.

If you have in mind the momentum eigenstates, you should realize that these are not wave functions but generalized functions which allow you transform from the position representation to momentum representation and vice versa. Here you normalize them "to a ##\delta## distribution". The momentum eigenstates are given by the equation
$$\hat{p} u_p(x)=-\mathrm{i} \partial_x u_p(x)=p u_p(x) \; \Rightarrow\; u_p(x)=N_p \exp(\mathrm{i} x p).$$
To "normalize" these functions conveniently you use
$$\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x u_{p}^*(x) u_{p'}(x)=N_p^* N_{p'} \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x \exp[\mathrm{i} x(p-p')=2 \pi \delta(p-p') |N_p|^2 \stackrel{!}{=} \delta(p-p') \;\Rightarrow \; N_p=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}},$$
up to an irrelevant phase factor. So for convenience one uses
$$u_p(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp(\mathrm{i} p x).$$
Then the momentum-space wave function is given by the Fourier transformation of the position-space wave function, i.e.,
$$\tilde{\psi}(p)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} u_p^*(x) \psi(x),$$
which is inverted by
$$\psi(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d}p u_p(x) \tilde{\psi}(p).$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and bhobba
Thanks for your reply. I am still reading your reply but I am still confusing on some parts. Since you mention the momentum space, I wonder if the following is physically possible or not. Taking crystal as example, in the text they always start the discussion with periodic lattice in position space so the k space is also periodic. So if k space is periodic, is it possible to input some wave in some form onto the crystal such that the wave in k space is periodic. If that's possible, how do we normalize the wave in k space? It is confusing me. I am always thinking a picture that in k space, we may see a Gaussian in every single recipical lattice site but such Gaussian is repeating from and to infinity so they don't add up to a finite value. In your example, you consider the delta function and derive the normalization factor, but that's still for plane wave. What I am thinking is something periodic in k space but not a plane wave.
 
Sorry, I misunderstood your question. It's not about periodic wave functions but particles in a periodic potential as models of crystals. This is a bit more complicated. So have a look in some solid-state physics book (like Ashcroft&Mermin) on Bloch states.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
vanhees71 said:
Sorry, I misunderstood your question. It's not about periodic wave functions but particles in a periodic potential as models of crystals. This is a bit more complicated. So have a look in some solid-state physics book (like Ashcroft&Mermin) on Bloch states.
So are Bloch states actual wavefunctions ? because after all they can only be normalized in an individual unit cell, which means that depending on the unit cell you choose the electron will always be in there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
555