B About Second equation of motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the second equation of motion, s = ut + 1/2 at^2, and how it can yield negative displacements. Negative displacements occur when the initial velocity (u) or acceleration (a) is negative, or when time (t) is negative while u is positive, indicating a look back into the past. The equation can be interpreted as current displacement being the product of initial velocity and time, with an additional term for displacement due to constant acceleration. The average velocity during constant acceleration is represented as u + 1/2 at, which can also be negative, leading to negative displacement. Overall, the equation holds true under the conditions of constant acceleration, regardless of whether time is considered positive or negative.
rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
I was wondering how the second equation of motion produces negative displacements ##s= ut+\frac 12 at^2## . Is ##\frac12 at^2## kind of distance operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what you mean by "distance operator", but I think that it is easiest to think of the equation as
$$
s = (u + \frac{1}{2} a t) t
$$
where the parenthesis represents the velocity at time ##t##. You will get negative displacements whenever that velocity is negative.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and hutchphd
rudransh verma said:
I was wondering how the second equation of motion produces negative displacements ##s= ut+\frac 12 at^2## . Is ##\frac12 at^2## kind of distance operator?
You can get a negative displacement if ##u## (the initial velocity) is negative.

You can get a negative displacement if ##a## (the ongoing acceleration) is negative and you wait long enough (or look far enough into the past).

You can get a negative displacement if ##t## is negative and ##u## is positive. So you are looking at displacement at some time in the past.

Graphically, you are looking at a parabola for which some portion extends below the t axis.

The way I read the second equation of motion is that ##s = ut## (Current displacement is equal to initial velocity times elapsed time). But if there is a constant acceleration, ##a##, then that results in an additional displacement of ##\frac{1}{2}at^2## that simply adds on.

As I understand @DrClaude, he takes the viewpoint that for constant acceleration, the average velocity is attained halfway through the time interval, so it is given by ##u + \frac{1}{2}at##. Multiply average velocity by the total time interval ##t## to get ##s=(u + \frac{1}{2}at)t##.

Six of one, half dozen of the other.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and Lnewqban
jbriggs444 said:
As I understand @DrClaude, he takes the viewpoint that for constant acceleration, the average velocity is attained halfway through the time interval, so it is given by u+12at. Multiply average velocity by the total time interval t to get s=(u+12at)t.
So ##u+\frac12at## is average velocity and when this is -ve then s is also -ve. The eqn of ##s=ut+\frac12at^2## is same as ##{x_2}-{x_1}= {v_{avg}}t##.
u is the initial velocity and due to a acceleration somewhere in time interval t ##{v_{avg}}## is achieved. v is the final velocity not included in the eqn ##u+\frac12at##
 
Last edited:
rudransh verma said:
So ##u+\frac12at## is average velocity and when this is -ve then s is also -ve.
Yes -- if we take ##t## as positive. But the equation still holds for ##t## negative if the constant acceleration was constant in the past.
rudransh verma said:
u is the initial velocity and due to a acceleration somewhere in time interval t ##{v_{avg}}## is achieved.
Here I am not sure whether there is a language difficulty or whether you are contemplating a non-constant [1 dimensional] velocity and invoking the mean value theorem. Yes, under these conditions, I believe that the mean value theorem guarantees that the average velocity be attained as an instantaneous velocity somewhere within the time interval.

We normally restrict ourselves to constant accelerations when using the SUVAT equations so that instantaneous velocity is equal to average velocity exactly at the midpoint of the interval.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Here I am not sure whether there is a language difficulty or whether you are contemplating a non-constant but continuous acceleration and invoking the mean value theorem.
Constant acceleration. Yes!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top