High School About Second equation of motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The second equation of motion, represented as s = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^2, can yield negative displacements under specific conditions. Negative displacement occurs when the initial velocity u is negative, the acceleration a is negative, or when time t is negative while u is positive. The equation can also be interpreted as s = (u + \frac{1}{2}at)t, where the average velocity is calculated over the time interval, leading to negative displacement when the average velocity is negative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically SUVAT equations.
  • Knowledge of basic physics concepts such as velocity, acceleration, and displacement.
  • Familiarity with the mean value theorem in calculus.
  • Ability to interpret graphical representations of motion, such as parabolas.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the SUVAT equations in physics.
  • Learn about the mean value theorem and its implications in motion analysis.
  • Explore graphical methods for visualizing motion under constant acceleration.
  • Investigate the effects of negative initial velocity and acceleration on displacement in various scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding motion under constant acceleration.

rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
I was wondering how the second equation of motion produces negative displacements ##s= ut+\frac 12 at^2## . Is ##\frac12 at^2## kind of distance operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what you mean by "distance operator", but I think that it is easiest to think of the equation as
$$
s = (u + \frac{1}{2} a t) t
$$
where the parenthesis represents the velocity at time ##t##. You will get negative displacements whenever that velocity is negative.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and hutchphd
rudransh verma said:
I was wondering how the second equation of motion produces negative displacements ##s= ut+\frac 12 at^2## . Is ##\frac12 at^2## kind of distance operator?
You can get a negative displacement if ##u## (the initial velocity) is negative.

You can get a negative displacement if ##a## (the ongoing acceleration) is negative and you wait long enough (or look far enough into the past).

You can get a negative displacement if ##t## is negative and ##u## is positive. So you are looking at displacement at some time in the past.

Graphically, you are looking at a parabola for which some portion extends below the t axis.

The way I read the second equation of motion is that ##s = ut## (Current displacement is equal to initial velocity times elapsed time). But if there is a constant acceleration, ##a##, then that results in an additional displacement of ##\frac{1}{2}at^2## that simply adds on.

As I understand @DrClaude, he takes the viewpoint that for constant acceleration, the average velocity is attained halfway through the time interval, so it is given by ##u + \frac{1}{2}at##. Multiply average velocity by the total time interval ##t## to get ##s=(u + \frac{1}{2}at)t##.

Six of one, half dozen of the other.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and Lnewqban
jbriggs444 said:
As I understand @DrClaude, he takes the viewpoint that for constant acceleration, the average velocity is attained halfway through the time interval, so it is given by u+12at. Multiply average velocity by the total time interval t to get s=(u+12at)t.
So ##u+\frac12at## is average velocity and when this is -ve then s is also -ve. The eqn of ##s=ut+\frac12at^2## is same as ##{x_2}-{x_1}= {v_{avg}}t##.
u is the initial velocity and due to a acceleration somewhere in time interval t ##{v_{avg}}## is achieved. v is the final velocity not included in the eqn ##u+\frac12at##
 
Last edited:
rudransh verma said:
So ##u+\frac12at## is average velocity and when this is -ve then s is also -ve.
Yes -- if we take ##t## as positive. But the equation still holds for ##t## negative if the constant acceleration was constant in the past.
rudransh verma said:
u is the initial velocity and due to a acceleration somewhere in time interval t ##{v_{avg}}## is achieved.
Here I am not sure whether there is a language difficulty or whether you are contemplating a non-constant [1 dimensional] velocity and invoking the mean value theorem. Yes, under these conditions, I believe that the mean value theorem guarantees that the average velocity be attained as an instantaneous velocity somewhere within the time interval.

We normally restrict ourselves to constant accelerations when using the SUVAT equations so that instantaneous velocity is equal to average velocity exactly at the midpoint of the interval.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Here I am not sure whether there is a language difficulty or whether you are contemplating a non-constant but continuous acceleration and invoking the mean value theorem.
Constant acceleration. Yes!
 
Thread 'A high school physics problem demonstrating relative motion'
I remembered a pretty high school problem from kinematics. But it seems it can help even undergraduates to develop their understanding of what a relative motion is. Consider a railway circle of radius ##r##. Assume that a carriage running along this circle has a speed ##v##. See the picture. A fly ##M## flies in the opposite direction and has a speed ##u,\quad |OM|=b##. Find a speed of the fly relative to the carriage. The obvious incorrect answer is ##u+v## while the correct answer is...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
599
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
988
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K