In Hatcher's book, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Coherent_topology, see the very end of page 135 and the beginning of page136 for the definition of the local degree of a map S^n-->S^n.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I don't get how the local degree degf|x_i could be anything else than ±degf: In the diagram of page 136 used to define the local degree, identify all the outer groups withZ. Start with 1 in the lower left [itex]H_n(S^n)[/itex] and follow the isomorphism that leads to [itex]H_n(U_i,U_i-x_i)[/itex].Since an isomorphism brings a generator to a generator, we end up with ±1. Then take this ±1 to [itex]H_n(V,V-y)[/itex] through f_*. We end up with ±degf|x_i by definition of the local degree. Now take that same initial 1 to [itex]H_n(V,V-y)[/itex] through the other outer route. We get [tex]1\stackrel{f}{\mapsto} \deg f\stackrel{\cong}{\mapsto}\pm \deg f[/tex], and so by commutativity of the diagram, \degf|x_i=±degf.

Where am I mistaken??

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# About the definition of local degree

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**