About the Lie algebra of our Lorentz group

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the correspondence between Lorentz transformations and SL(2,C) transformations on 2-spinors as presented in Ryder's "Quantum Field Theory." The confusion arises from the dimensionality of the Pauli matrices (2x2) compared to the Lorentz generators (4x4). It is clarified that the operators K and σ are abstract and satisfy specific commutation relations rather than being tied to a particular matrix representation. Additionally, the factorization of the Lorentz group into SU(2) × SU(2) is discussed, emphasizing that this does not imply compactness due to the nature of the complexified Lie algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie algebras and their representations
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations and their properties
  • Knowledge of SU(2) and its role in quantum mechanics
  • Basic comprehension of quantum field theory concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Lorentz group and its generators
  • Explore the relationship between SL(2,C) and 2-spinors in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of complexified Lie algebras on group compactness
  • Review the mathematical foundations of quantum field theory as presented in Ryder's work
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and anyone studying the mathematical structures underlying quantum field theory.

Kontilera
Messages
176
Reaction score
24
Hello!

I'm currently reading Ryder - Quantum Field Theory and am a bit confused about his discussion on the correpsondence between Lorentz transformations and SL(2,C) transformations on 2-spinor.
He writes that the Lie algebra of Lorentz transformations can be satisfied by setting
\vec{K} =\pm \frac{i \vec{\sigma}}{2}.
Here it seems as if the dimensions are mixed up. The Pauli matrices are 2 times 2 while the Loretnz generators are 4 times 4.

Secondly he argues that the Lorentzgroup can be ''factorized'' into SU(2) \times SU(2) but how come this goes along with the fact that the Loretnz group is non-compact.
It seems as if we take the product group of two compact group the resulting group is compact?
Am I wrong about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here it seems as if the dimensions are mixed up. The Pauli matrices are 2 times 2 while the Loretnz generators are 4 times 4.
He means K and σ as abstract operators which satisfy a certain set of commutation relations, not a particular matrix representation of those operators.
Secondly he argues that the Lorentzgroup can be ''factorized'' into SU(2)×SU(2) but how come this goes along with the fact that the Loretnz group is non-compact.
To go from one set of generators to the other you have to consider the complexified Lie algebra, A = (J + i K)/2 and B = (J − i K)/2. This does not preserve group compactness.
 
Ah cool!
Maybe I'm a bit under the level that this book is written on.. I come back with future confusions. :)
Thanks Bill!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K