About this whole question of when a theory is scientific

  • Thread starter Thread starter josh1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scientific Theory
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the testability and falsifiability of string theory and loop quantum gravity (LQG). It emphasizes that while string theory is theoretically testable, it lacks clear experimental predictions that could definitively falsify it, as theorists can adjust parameters to fit data. In contrast, LQG aims to produce specific predictions that could be tested, such as the behavior of gamma photons, but has yet to achieve this goal. The conversation highlights the ongoing challenges in understanding the gravitational physics of the vacuum, which affects both theories' ability to yield empirical results. Ultimately, the debate reflects a broader concern about the current state of theoretical physics and the need for concrete experimental validation.
  • #31
f-h said:
*It is just a dimensionless number and there's nothing to measure.*

Like the fine structure constant? Or rather, the CKM angle in QCD?

The fine structure constant can't be described as simply some dimensionless number. It characterizes the strength of the electromagnetic interaction and isn't measured but calculated in terms of the fundamental physical constants of QED. CKM doesn't help you either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K