Absentee Ballot Loopholes: Are Our Votes Secure?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pattylou
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the security and integrity of absentee ballots in the voting process. Participants explore concerns about the lack of paper trails for absentee ballots, the potential for fraud, and the implications of these issues on election integrity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note an increase in the use of absentee ballots and express concern that the requirements for paper trails do not apply to them, despite being counted with the same hardware as regular ballots.
  • One participant references Jim March, an activist focused on identifying loopholes in the voting process, and questions the absence of results tapes for absentee ballots.
  • Another participant mentions issues of election fraud in the context of absentee ballots, citing examples from a recent British general election.
  • There is a discussion about the purpose of a paper trail, with one participant arguing that the absentee ballot itself serves as a paper trail, questioning the need for additional printed slips from counting machines.
  • Another participant acknowledges the value of a paper trail in demonstrating discrepancies in reported numbers, suggesting it aids in identifying corruption.
  • Concerns are raised about absentee ballots being exploited for fraud, including instances of deceased individuals being associated with absentee voting in South Florida.
  • Local laws limiting the number of ballots that vote harvesters can collect are mentioned, highlighting ongoing issues with ballot collection practices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various concerns regarding absentee ballots, with no consensus reached on the effectiveness of current measures or the extent of the issues raised. Multiple competing views on the implications of absentee voting and the adequacy of safeguards remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific incidents and practices related to absentee voting without providing comprehensive evidence or resolution to the claims made. The discussion reflects a range of opinions on the security of absentee ballots and the potential for fraud, indicating a complex and unresolved landscape.

pattylou
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
Are more and more people choosing to use absentee ballots? This is what I have heard, and a quick google turns up articles that seem to support the idea, such as this one from Iowa: http://www.sos.state.ia.us/press/04/2004_10_13.html

What is disturbing, is that although there is a trend towards more paper trails for electronic voting machines, evidently the requirements do not apply to absentee ballots - even though they are counted with the same hardware as the regular ballots.
The Diebold absentee ballot optical scanners ("Central Count") don't record the vote totals this way, even though they're based on the same hardware as a standard precinct optical scan AND they have the little printer installed! They could easily print results for each "batch" of absentees but that feature is completely turned off.
... that quote is in this discussion: http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/14296.html

I don't have another source for the claim. (When I google for additional information, I come up with many hits that are very convoluted... and I don't quickly see which ones are pertinent.) Jim March (who I quoted above) is an activist and heavily invested in finding where loopholes exist in the voting process. I have no reason to think that he is making up the bit about no results tape on absentee ballots - and it is distressing to think that we are always one step behind the vendors in terms of getting an accurate vote count.

There appear to be so many loopholes in how votes are counted in this country, I don't know how we can ever get to the bottom of it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
pattylou said:
Are more and more people choosing to use absentee ballots? This is what I have heard, and a quick google turns up articles that seem to support the idea, such as this one from Iowa: http://www.sos.state.ia.us/press/04/2004_10_13.html
What is disturbing, is that although there is a trend towards more paper trails for electronic voting machines, evidently the requirements do not apply to absentee ballots - even though they are counted with the same hardware as the regular ballots.
... that quote is in this discussion: http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/14296.html
I don't have another source for the claim. (When I google for additional information, I come up with many hits that are very convoluted... and I don't quickly see which ones are pertinent.) Jim March (who I quoted above) is an activist and heavily invested in finding where loopholes exist in the voting process. I have no reason to think that he is making up the bit about no results tape on absentee ballots - and it is distressing to think that we are always one step behind the vendors in terms of getting an accurate vote count.
There appear to be so many loopholes in how votes are counted in this country, I don't know how we can ever get to the bottom of it!
This was a major issue in the last British general election even though they do not use electronic counting machines. The number of absentee ballots has shot up enormously and there were numerous instances uncovered of election fraud such as 10 or more fictitious people living at one address so it is a path that needs to be treaded very carefully.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point of the paper trail is to have it voter-verified. In the case of absentee voting, the ballot itself is a paper trail. There wouldn't be much point in having the counting machine print out a separate slip of paper, as the voter wouldn't be there to verify that what it prints is what he actually voted for. It would be like the real e-machines printing out a slip of paper for each vote cast but not letting the voter see it. How does that provide additional security?
 
Good point. I suppose the main value of a paper trail in the case of hard-copy ballots, is that you can more easily demonstrate when a number has been wrongly reported. In other words, it l;eaves more of a trail if there is corruption. But, I hadn't thought of it that way, thanks.
 
dead people vote absentee in south fla
just another way to stuff ballot boxes

new local laws limit the vote harvesters to 3 ballots each
before this change some had 100s of votes turned in by harvesters each
they collect them from nursing homes or go door to door
others collected names from tombstones
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
7K
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K