Absorption lines and emission lines in stellar spectra

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the prevalence of absorption lines compared to emission lines in stellar spectra, exploring the underlying physical conditions and mechanisms involved. It touches on theoretical aspects, observational phenomena, and the conditions under which different types of lines are observed in stellar environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the cooler temperatures of the stellar atmosphere compared to the hotter interior contribute to the dominance of absorption lines over emission lines.
  • One participant notes that emission lines are typically observed in specific types of stars and are less common overall, as most stars exhibit absorption lines superimposed on a continuous spectrum.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that the dense and hot material near a star's surface leads to broad emission bands, making them harder to identify compared to the narrow absorption lines from cooler gas.
  • It is proposed that emission lines may be more likely found in low-density gases, such as those in nebulae, where high-energy particles and photons can excite the gas to produce line emission spectra.
  • Participants discuss the relative visibility of emission lines against the dark background of space, suggesting that their power is diminished due to distance from their energy source.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the conditions under which absorption and emission lines are observed, with no consensus reached on the primary reasons for the differences in prevalence.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about temperature, density, and the nature of stellar atmospheres, which may not be universally applicable. The relationship between stellar types and the presence of emission lines remains unresolved.

Haynes Kwon
Gold Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Why do we see more absorption lines in stellar spectra than emission lines?
Why do we see more absorption lines in stellar spectra than emission lines?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The surface of the sun is cooler than the interior.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin
Emission lines are present in spectrum of only few types of stars, see
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission-line_star

Most of the stars exhibits only absorption lines (superimposed on the continuous blackbody radiation). As the light radiated in photosphere propagates through upper layers of stellar atmosphere, some of the wavelengths are absorbed by colder gas.
 
Haynes Kwon said:
Why do we see more absorption lines in stellar spectra than emission lines?
The light from the very hot interior or near the surface will have a continuous spectrum. The material is very dense and the atoms / ions will be moving very fast. Those factors cause the emitted lines to become bands, which are not easy to identify.
Otoh, the cooler, lower pressure gas which surrounds a star will absorb only narrow band ranges (lines) of the spectrum.
I think you would only be likely to find emission lines from low density gases (say, on nebulae) that are subjected to high enough levels of high energy particles and photons from 'nearby' stars. They can produce line emission spectra as they are under more like 'lab' conditions.
The power of emission lines will be low, too, because of the circumstances (very distant from their energy source) - much lower than the absorbed power by gases which surround a star. They will be visible against the Dark background of deep space.
I think that makes some logical sense.
PS Those conditions can happen where the star is of the kind described in the above link where there is a high level of UV energy from a very hot star and that causes excitation of the nearby gases to emit optical energy photons against a relatively low optical background from the star itself.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K