Why Are Star Spectra Shown as Absorption Rather Than Emission?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nmsurobert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of star spectra, specifically why they are typically represented as absorption spectra rather than emission spectra. It explores the underlying physics of stellar light and the processes involved in the formation of these spectra.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the rationale behind representing star spectra as absorption rather than emission spectra.
  • Another participant explains that the spectrum observed is a result of the physics of the star, where most light is continuous black-body radiation, with absorption lines superimposed due to specific wavelengths being absorbed by the stellar atmosphere.
  • A further contribution clarifies that the continuous spectrum is influenced by the effective temperature of the star's photosphere and that the absorption lines are determined by the atmospheric composition and ionization levels.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the explanation of star spectra being primarily absorption spectra due to the physical processes involved, but the initial question reflects a lack of understanding that is addressed through clarification.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not delve into the mathematical details of the processes involved or the specific conditions under which different types of spectra might be observed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in astrophysics, particularly those looking to understand the nature of stellar spectra and the processes that govern their formation.

nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36
I understand the process of electron transitions but I don't understand how or why these pictures are put together. If we're looking at the spectra of a star, why are this pictures shown as absorption spectra and not emission?
spec_with_temp.gif
 

Attachments

  • spec_with_temp.gif
    spec_with_temp.gif
    82.6 KB · Views: 1,115
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This is the spectrum of the light that actually comes from the star. We don't get to choose whether emission or absorption dominates - the physics of the star determines that. Most of the light from the star is continuous black-body radiation from the stellar plasma and not from atomic emission lines. The absorption lines remove some of this continuum spectrum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unusually_wrong, Klystron and lomidrevo
The terminology can be confusing sometimes, indeed. The spectrum of a typical star is continuous, determined by the effective temperature of the photosphere of the star. However, there are absorption spectral lines superimposed on this continuum, because photons of some specific wavelengths are being absorbed as trying to escape through the stellar atmosphere. The absorption spectrum is determined by the composition of the atmosphere and by the level of ionization.
 
ahhh that makes total sense. thank you guys!

i usually do a solid hour of digging before i consult the experts. thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K