Abstract Algebra Hello Experts: Proving Theorems About Ideals and Radicals

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
DukeSteve
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello Experts,

I can't find the proof of this theorems please help me:

Given that there is a commutative ring R and 2 ideals I and J, also given that I is included in J

I need to prove
1) radical of I is in radical of J
2) radical of radical of ideal I = radical of ideal I.


Please give me a detailed proof, I want to understand the proof and your way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a hw, I just want to understand why it's right. If you don't have the answer just don't answer, let others answer it.
 
I'm sure micromass knows the answer to this: he's a very clever guy. It's just against PF rules to give help on homework without seeing the poster's attempt.

1) This seems straightforward: Given [itex]x \in \sqrt{I}[/itex] then [itex]x^n \in I[/itex] for some positive integer n. Since [itex]I \subseteq J[/itex] then [itex]x^n \in J[/itex] as well.

2)Suppose [itex]x \in \sqrt{\sqrt{I}}[/itex]. Then there is some positive integer n s.t. [itex]x^n \in \sqrt{I}[/itex]. By the definition of [itex]\sqrt{I}[/itex], there is some pos. int. m s.t. [itex](x^n)^m \in I[/itex]. Then [itex]x^{nm} \in I[/itex], so [itex]x \in \sqrt{I}[/itex].

The converse is trivial: given [itex]x \in \sqrt{I}[/itex] then [itex]x^1 = x \in \sqrt{I}[/itex], so [itex]x \in \sqrt{\sqrt{I}}[/itex].
 
Thanks a lot for this great explanation. It's really not from HW.

Could you please do me a favor and explain why is this right:

If I have D ring with division but not a field and it's char !=2. If I know that F is centralizer of D (that means F is a field) and I have x in D such that x^2 is in F but x is not in F.

What does this mean that x is not in F? Why?
 
I'm not sure I understand the question. I'm pretty sure you can have x in D with x2 in F but still have [itex]x \notin F[/itex]. Take the quaternions for example (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion). They form a division ring but the element j isn't in F since ij = k but ji = -k. However j2 = -1, which does commute with every element and thus is in F.