AC Resonance Experiment: Missed Step in Procedure!

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an AC resonance experiment involving a parallel RLC circuit. The original poster is seeking clarification on a missed procedural step related to observing voltage across the inductor at a constant current setting, particularly regarding the interpretation of the voltage trace at resonant frequency.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the meaning of "constant current" in the context of AC resonance and whether it implies a DC condition. There are discussions about the nature of the current and voltage observations, with some suggesting that the current is indeed AC and remains constant in amplitude while the frequency varies.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of the experiment and the definitions involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the constant current setting and its implications for the experiment, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion surrounding the terminology used in the experiment, particularly the phrase "constant current," and how it relates to AC versus DC conditions. There is also a request for additional data from the original poster to better understand the experiment's setup.

Roodles01
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Having carried outan AC Resonance experiment recently, I find that I have missed a simple step in the procedure- or left it out of my lab book - grrr!

For a parallel RLC circuit I was asked to observe voltage across the inductor (coil) at a constant current setting.
I'm assuming the trace to be a peak at resonant frequency. Could someone confirm this & elaborate if possible, please.

I didn't record this & although just a small part of the report I should include it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Roodles01 said:
Having carried outan AC Resonance experiment recently, I find that I have missed a simple step in the procedure- or left it out of my lab book - grrr!

For a parallel RLC circuit I was asked to observe voltage across the inductor (coil) at a constant current setting.
I'm assuming the trace to be a peak at resonant frequency. Could someone confirm this & elaborate if possible, please.

I didn't record this & although just a small part of the report I should include it.

The term "constant current" implies a DC condition, not an AC resonant condition. Could you please clarify?
 
I think I know that the poster means that the AC current does not change. Constant current does not have to mean it is DC.
They have said that there is a peak at the resonant frequency this sounds like a 100% AC question.
 
Constant current setting probably refers to the combination of the position of the output dial on the power supply and the operating mode of the power supply.

I expect the circuit consists of a load that is a parallel RLC circuit driven by a current source of constant amplitude and variable frequency. The voltage across the load will thus be a maximum when the impedance of the load is a xxxxxx . This xxxxxx occurs when .....
 
Yes, the current is A.C & is set to an output which does not change & the frequency is swept over a range.

RLC circuit.jpeg
 
We have done more or less the same thing but for a series circuit. In that case the voltage was kept constant (it was shown on a multimeter) and we observed the AC voltage across the series resistor using an oscilloscope. Resonance could be obtained quite easil by changing the frequency.
 
Roodles, do you have some data from your experiment? Do you have values for the components and settings on the signal generator?

[ a scan of your lab-book would work too ]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K