Acceleration of blocks on a slope

Click For Summary
Two blocks connected by a string over a pulley are analyzed for acceleration, with block A on a 30-degree incline and block B hanging. The frictional force for block A is calculated, leading to equations of motion for both blocks. The initial assumption that block B is pulled up due to block A's weight is questioned, highlighting the importance of slope direction and friction. After several calculations, discrepancies arise in the acceleration results, prompting further examination of the equations used. The discussion emphasizes the need to correctly account for the forces acting on both blocks to determine the accurate acceleration.
Northbysouth
Messages
241
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Two blocks are connected by a string that goes over an ideal pulley. Block A has a mass of 3.00 kg and can slide over a rough plane inclined at 30 degress to the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between block A and the plane is 0.400. block B has a mass of 2.77 kg. What is the acceleration of the blocks?

Homework Equations


fk = ukFn

The Attempt at a Solution



Fn - 3gcos(30)
Fn = 25.4611

fk = 0.4*25.4611
= 10.1845

Using force diagrams I identified the forces acting on the blocks to be:

T is the tension in the rope

For block A
T - fk - 3gcos(30) = 3a

For block B
T - 2.77g = 2.77a

Then I combine them

fk - 3gsin(30) -3a = 2.77g - 2.77a
a = 98.4

I know the answer is 0.392m/s^2 but I don't know where I'm going wrong. I assumed that block B is being pulled up because block A has a greater weight. Is this a wrong assumption?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Northbysouth! :smile:
Northbysouth said:
fk - 3gsin(30) -3a = 2.77g - 2.77a
a = 98.4

but you still need to find fk :confused:
I assumed that block B is being pulled up because block A has a greater weight. Is this a wrong assumption?

depends on the slope …

obviously, if the slope was 0°, then B would win! :wink:
 
I found fk = 10.1845

Could you be more specific about the slope? How do I determine whether the friction is acting in the same direction as the tension or in the opposite direction?
 
to find the direction of friction, imagine that there's no friction, and see which way the blocks go :smile:

(and I'm off to bed :zzz:)
 
I ran the calculations again with friction acting opposite to the tension.

T - 10.1845 - 3gsin(30) =3a for block A

T =2.77a + 27.146 for block B

I substituted T into block A's equation:

2.77a+27.146 -10.1845 - 3gsin(30) = 3a
a = 0.520145

This still seems a ways off from 0.392. Am I missing something?
 
(just got up :zzz:)
Northbysouth said:
T - 10.1845 - 3gsin(30) =3a for block A

T =2.77a + 27.146 for block B

I substituted T into block A's equation:

2.77a+27.146 -10.1845 - 3gsin(30) = 3a
a = 0.520145

i] if you subtract equation B from A (so that the RHS is 3a), those first two terms on the LHS should be minus

ii] but your B equation is wrong if you're measuring a downwards (ie, if B is going down) …

then a = mg - T, not T - mg :wink:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K